Control system for plant

ABSTRACT

A control system for a plant is disclosed. According to this system, a value of a switching function which is defined as a linear function of a deviation between the output of the plant and a control target value, is calculated. A reaching mode input is calculated. The reaching mode input contributes to placing a deviation state quantity which is defined based on the deviation, onto a switching straight line on which the value of the switching function becomes zero. The reaching mode input is corrected according to the value of the switching function. A control input to the plant is calculated with a response specifying type control, and the control input includes the reaching mode input. The plant is controlled with the calculated control input.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a control system for a plant, and moreparticularly to a control system controlling a plant with a responsespecifying type controller based on a sliding mode control theory whichis one of robust control theories.

There has been known a sliding mode controller for controlling a plantaccording to a sliding mode control which is one of response specifyingtype controls (Japanese Patent Laid-open No. 2000-110636, for example).Specifically, the sliding mode controller shown in this publicationcontrols an internal combustion engine. In the sliding mode control, itis possible to specify (change) a damping characteristic of a deviationbetween an output of the plant (controlled object) and a control targetvalue. Therefore, such control is called as “response specifying typecontrol”. Other than the sliding mode control, a back stepping controlis also known as a response specifying type control. In the responsespecifying type control, a control input to a plant is calculated usinga switching function which is defined as a linear function of adeviation between a control target value and an output of the plant, anda damping characteristic of the deviation can be changed by changing theswitching function.

In the above response specifying type control, there are two controlmodes. One is a reaching mode in which a value of the switching functionis converged to “0”. The other is a sliding mode in which a controldeviation is converged to “0” maintaining the condition where theswitching function value equals “0”. The sliding mode is a robustcontrol mode against disturbance or a modeling error (a differencebetween the characteristics of the actual controlled object and thecharacteristics of the controlled object model). However, in thereaching mode, the control may easily be affected by a change in thedynamic characteristics of the controlled object or disturbance.Accordingly, in the reaching mode, a change in the dynamiccharacteristics of the controlled object or disturbance may sometimescause a condition where an overshoot of the plant output with respect tothe control target value is prone to occur.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the present invention to provide a control system fora plant which is capable of positively preventing an overshoot in theconverging process of the plant output to make the plant output convergesmoothly to the control target value.

To achieve the above object, the present invention provides a controlsystem for a plant. The control system includes a response specifyingtype controller (21) for controlling the plant with a responsespecifying type control so that an output (DTH, DPACT) of the plantcoincide with a control target value (DTHR, DPCMD). The responsespecifying type controller (21) includes switching function valuecalculating means, reaching mode input calculating means, and correctingmeans. The switching function value calculating means calculates a value(σ) of a switching function which is defined as a linear function of adeviation (e) between the output (DTH, DPACT) of the plant and thecontrol target value (DTHR, DPCMD). The reaching mode input calculatingmeans calculates a reaching mode input (Urch, Uadp) that contributes toplacing a deviation state quantity (e(k), e(k−1)) which is defined basedon the deviation (e), onto a switching straight line on which the value(σ) of the switching function becomes zero. The correcting meanscorrects the reaching mode input (Urch, Uadp) according to the value (σ)of the switching function. A control input (Usl) from the responsespecifying type controller (21) to the plant includes the reaching modeinput (Urch, Uadp).

With this configuration, the reaching mode input that contributes toplacing the deviation state quantity onto the switching straight line iscalculated, and the calculated reaching mode input is correctedaccording to the value of the switching function. This correction makesit possible to prevent an overshoot in the converging process of theplant output to make the plant output converge smoothly to the controltarget value.

Preferably, the reaching mode input calculating means calculates areaching law input (Urch) by accumulating a value which is obtained bymultiplying an amount of change (σ(n)−σ(n−1)) in the value of theswitching function with a first gain (−F/b1) (Eq. (9b)), and thecorrecting means changes the first gain (−F/b1) according to the value(σ) of the switching function.

With this configuration, the reaching law input is calculated byaccumulating a value which is obtained by multiplying an amount ofchange in the value of the switching function with the first gain. Thiscalculation method of the reaching law input prevents abrupt change inthe reaching law input when the first gain is corrected by thecorrecting means, to thereby prevent reduction of controllability uponchanging the first gain.

Preferably, the reaching mode input calculating means calculates anadaptive law input (Uadp) by accumulating a value which is obtained bymultiplying the value (σ) of the switching function with a second gain(−GΔT2/b1) (Eq. (10b)), and the correcting means changes the second gain(−GΔT2/b1) according to the value (σ) of the switching function.

With this configuration, the adaptive law input is calculated byaccumulating a value which is obtained by multiplying the value of theswitching function with the second gain. This calculation method of theadaptive law input prevents abrupt change in the adaptive law input whenthe second gain is corrected by the correcting means, to thereby preventreduction of controllability upon changing the second gain.

Preferably, the reaching mode input calculating means includes limitmeans (S251-S255, S271-S275) for limiting the value (σ) of the switchingfunction within a predetermined range (−XSGMSL, XSGMSL), and calculatesthe reaching mode input (Urch, Uadp) using the switching function value(SGMS) limited by the limit means.

With this configuration, the value of the switching function is limitedwithin the predetermined range, and the reaching mode input iscalculated using the limited switching function value. This makes itpossible to prevent an overshoot when the control target value abruptlychanges.

Preferably, the correcting means reduces an absolute value of the firstgain (−F/b1) or the second gain (−GΔT2/b1) as an absolute value (|σ|) ofthe switching function increases (FIG. 13A).

Preferably, the control system further includes identifying means (22)for identifying a model parameter vector (θ) of a controlled objectmodel which is obtained by modeling the plant, and the reaching modeinput calculating means calculates the reaching mode input (Urch, Uadp)using an element (b1) of the model parameter vector (θ).

Preferably, the plant includes a throttle valve actuating device (10)having a throttle valve (3) of an internal combustion engine (1) andactuating means (6) for actuating the throttle valve (3), and theresponse specifying type controller calculates a parameter (DUT) fordetermining a control input to be applied to the throttle valveactuating device (10) to make an opening (TH) of the throttle valvecoincide with a target opening (THR).

With this configuration, an opening of the throttle valve is controlledto coincide with the target opening with the control input including thereaching mode input. Accordingly, it is possible to prevent an overshootof the throttle valve opening to the target opening, to thereby make thethrottle valve opening converge smoothly to the target opening.

Further the present invention provides another control system for aplant. The control system includes a response specifying type controller(21) for controlling the plant with a response specifying type controlso that an output (DTH, DPACT) of the plant coincide with a controltarget value (DTHR, DPCMD). The response specifying type controller (21)includes switching function value calculating means, reaching mode inputcalculating means, and correcting means. The switching function valuecalculating means calculates a value (σ) of a switching function whichis defined as a linear function of a deviation (e) between the output(DTH, DPACT) of the plant and the control target value (DTHR, DPCMD).The reaching mode input calculating means calculates a reaching modeinput (Urch, Uadp) that contributes to placing a deviation statequantity (e(k), e(k−1)) which is defined based on the deviation (e),onto a switching straight line on which the value (σ) of the switchingfunction becomes zero. The correcting means corrects the reaching modeinput (Urch, Uadp) according to the deviation (e) (FIG. 13B). A controlinput (Usl) from the response specifying type controller (21) to theplant includes the reaching mode input (Urch, Uadp).

With this configuration, the reaching mode input is corrected accordingto the deviation between the output of the plant and the control targetvalue. This correction makes it possible to prevent an overshoot in theconverging process of the plant output when the control target valueabruptly changes, to thereby make the plant output converge smoothly tothe control target value.

Preferably, the correcting means reduces an absolute value of thereaching mode input (Urch, Uadp) as an absolute value of the deviation(e) increases.

Further the present invention provides another control system for aplant. The control system includes a response specifying type controller(21) for controlling the plant with a response specifying type controlso that an output (DTH, DPACT) of the plant coincide with a controltarget value (DTHR, DPCMD). The response specifying type controller (21)includes switching function value calculating means, reaching mode inputcalculating means, and correcting means. The switching function valuecalculating means calculates a value (σ) of a switching function whichis defined as a linear function of a deviation (e) between the output(DTH, DPACT) of the plant and the control target value (DTHR, DPCMD).The reaching mode input calculating means calculates a reaching modeinput (Urch, Uadp) that contributes to placing a deviation statequantity (e(k), e(k−1)) which is defined based on the deviation (e),onto a switching straight line on which the value (σ) of the switchingfunction becomes zero. The correcting means corrects the reaching modeinput (Urch, Uadp) according to the output (DTH) of the plant (FIG.13C). A control input (Usl) from the response specifying type controller(21) to the plant includes the reaching mode input (Urch, Uadp).

With this configuration, the reaching mode input is corrected accordingto the output of the plant. This correction makes it possible to set thereaching mode input to a value which is suitable for the dynamiccharacteristics of the plant that change depending on the output of theplant, to thereby improve controllability of the control system.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a throttle valve actuating deviceand a control system for the throttle valve actuating device, accordingto a first embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram showing functions realized by anelectronic control unit (ECU) shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing control characteristics of a sliding modecontroller corresponding to a value of a switching function settingparameter (VPOLE);

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a range for setting control gains (F, G) ofthe sliding mode controller;

FIGS. 5A and 5B are diagram illustrating a drift of a model parameter;

FIGS. 6A and 6B are diagrams illustrating a process of effectinglow-pass filtering on an identifying error (ide);

FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating frequency components of an output of acontrolled object;

FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating a sampling process using a shortsampling period compared with a change rate of an output of thecontrolled object;

FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating a manner in which a sampling frequencyis set;

FIGS. 10A and 10B are diagrams showing damping characteristics of acontrol deviation (e(k));

FIG. 11 is a diagram showing a waveform representing how a throttlevalve opening deviation (DTH) changes;

FIG. 12 is a diagram showing waveforms representing how a switchingfunction value (σ) changes, the waveforms corresponding to the waveformshown in FIG. 11;

FIGS. 13A, 13B, and 13C are diagrams illustrating a method of settingcontrol gains (F, G) of the sliding mode controller;

FIGS. 14A and 14B are timing charts illustrating a problem that ariseswhen the control gains (F, G) abruptly change;

FIGS. 15A through 15C are timing charts illustrating a case in which asecond period (ΔT2) is used as a control period;

FIGS. 16A through 16D are timing charts illustrating a case in whichmodel parameters are calculated at intervals of a second period (ΔT2)and a control period is set to a first period (ΔT1);

FIG. 17 is a timing chart illustrating a moving-averaging calculation ofmodel parameters;

FIG. 18 is a timing chart illustrating the manner in which a steadydeviation is converged by an adaptive law input (Uadp);

FIGS. 19A and 19B are timing charts illustrating a nonlinear input(Unl);

FIG. 20 is a diagram showing a table for calculating a nonlinear inputgain (Knl);

FIG. 21 is a timing chart illustrating a change in a dither signal value(Fwave);

FIG. 22 is a diagram showing a relation between a frequency (fwave) of aforced vibration input and a resonant frequency (fr) of a controlledobject;

FIGS. 23A through 23C are timing charts illustrating reduction of anidentifying error (ide), which is provided by a forced vibration input(Uwave);

FIGS. 24A and 24B are timing charts illustrating an overshoot of thethrottle valve opening deviation amount (DTH) and its improvement;

FIGS. 25A and 25B are diagrams showing tables for setting a basic value(Kdampbs) and a correction coefficient (Kkdamp) of a damping controlgain;

FIGS. 26A and 26B are diagrams illustrating a limit process of modelparameters (a1″, a2″);

FIG. 27 is a diagram illustrating a method of setting reference modelparameters (a1base, a2base, b1base);

FIGS. 28A through 28C are timing charts illustrating a problem with aconventional method of setting a reference model parameter (b1base);

FIGS. 29A through 29C are timing charts illustrating a method of settinga reference model parameter (b1base) according to the first embodiment;

FIG. 30 is a flowchart showing a throttle valve opening control process;

FIG. 31 is a flowchart showing a process of setting a state variableexecuted in the process shown in FIG. 30;

FIG. 32 is a flowchart showing a process of identifying model parametersexecuted in the process shown in FIG. 30;

FIG. 33 is a flowchart showing a process of calculating an identifyingerror (ide) executed in the process shown in FIG. 32;

FIG. 34 is a flowchart showing a first limit process executed in theprocess shown in FIG. 30;

FIG. 35 is a flowchart showing a limit process of model parameters (a1″,a2″) executed in the process shown in FIG. 34;

FIG. 36 is a diagram illustrating the process shown in FIG. 35;

FIG. 37 is a flowchart showing a limit process of a model parameter(b1″) executed in the process shown in FIG. 34;

FIG. 38 is a flowchart showing a limit process of a model parameter(c1″) executed in the process shown in FIG. 34;

FIG. 39 is a flowchart showing a second limit process executed in theprocess shown in FIG. 30;

FIG. 40 is a flowchart showing a process of calculating a control input(Usl) executed in the process shown in FIG. 30;

FIG. 41 is a flowchart showing a process of calculating a switchingfunction value (σ) executed in the process shown in FIG. 40;

FIG. 42 is a flowchart showing a process of calculating a switchingfunction setting parameter (VPOLE) executed in the process shown in FIG.41;

FIG. 43 is a diagram showing a table used executed in the process shownin FIG. 42;

FIG. 44 is a flowchart showing a process of calculating a reaching lawinput (Urch) executed in the process shown in FIG. 40;

FIG. 45 is a flowchart showing a process of calculating an adaptive lawinput (Uadp) executed in the process shown in FIG. 40;

FIG. 46 is a flowchart showing a process of calculating a nonlinearinput (Unl) executed in the process shown in FIG. 40;

FIG. 47 is a flowchart showing a process of calculating a forcedvibration input (Uwave) executed in the process shown in FIG. 40;

FIG. 48 is a diagram showing a table used executed in the process shownin FIG. 47;

FIG. 49 is a flowchart showing a process of calculating a damping input(Udamp) executed in the process shown in FIG. 40;

FIG. 50 is a flowchart showing a process of determining stability of thesliding mode controller executed in the process shown in FIG. 30;

FIG. 51 is a schematic diagram of a hydraulic positioning apparatusaccording to a second embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 52 is a block diagram of a control system including the hydraulicpositioning device shown in FIG. 51.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The preferred embodiments of the present invention will be describedwith reference to the following drawings.

First Embodiment

FIG. 1 schematically shows a configuration of a throttle valve controlsystem according to a first embodiment of the present invention. Aninternal combustion engine (hereinafter referred to as “engine”) 1 hasan intake passage 2 with a throttle valve 3 disposed therein. Thethrottle valve 3 is provided with a return spring 4 as a firstenergizing means for energizing the throttle valve 3 in a closingdirection, and a resilient member 5 as a second energizing means forenergizing the throttle valve 3 in an opening direction. The throttlevalve 3 can be actuated by a motor 6 as an actuating means through gears(not shown). When the actuating force from the motor 6 is not applied tothe throttle valve 3, an opening TH of the throttle valve 3 ismaintained at a default opening THDEF (for example, 5 degrees) where theenergizing force of the return spring 4 and the energizing force of theresilient member 5 are in equilibrium.

The motor 6 is connected to an electronic control unit (hereinafterreferred to as “ECU”) 7. The operation of the motor 6 is controlled bythe ECU 7. The throttle valve 3 is associated with a throttle valveopening sensor 8 for detecting the throttle valve opening TH. A detectedsignal from the throttle valve opening sensor 8 is supplied to the ECU7.

Further, the ECU 7 is connected to an acceleration sensor 9 fordetecting a depression amount ACC of an accelerator pedal to detect anoutput demanded by the driver of the vehicle on which the engine 1 ismounted. A detected signal from the acceleration sensor 9 is supplied tothe ECU 7.

The ECU 7 has an input circuit, an A/D converter, a central processingunit (CPU), a memory circuit, and an output circuit. The input circuitis supplied with detected signals from the throttle valve opening sensor8 and the acceleration sensor 9. The A/D converter converts inputsignals into digital signals. The CPU carries out various processoperations. The memory circuit has a ROM (read only memory) for storingprocesses executed by the CPU, and maps and tables that are referred toin the processes, a RAM for storing results of executing processes bythe CPU. The output circuit supplies an energizing current to the motor6. The ECU 7 determines a target opening THR of the throttle valve 3according to the depression amount ACC of the accelerator pedal,determines a control quantity DUT for the motor 6 in order to make thedetected throttle valve opening TH coincide with the target opening THR,and supplies an electric signal according to the control quantity DUT tothe motor 6.

In the present embodiment, a throttle valve actuating device 10 thatincludes the throttle valve 3, the return spring 4, the resilient member5, and the motor 6 is a controlled object. An input to be applied to thecontrolled object is a duty ratio DUT of the electric signal applied tothe motor 6. An output from the controlled object is the throttle valveopening TH detected by the throttle valve opening sensor 8.

A model defined by the equation (1) shown below is set as a controlledobject model according to the frequency response characteristics of thethrottle valve actuating device 10. It has been confirmed that thefrequency response characteristics of the model can be approximated tothe characteristics of the throttle valve actuating device 10.

DTH(k+1)=a 1×DTH(k)+a 2×DTH(k−1)+b 1×DUT(k−d)+c 1  (1)

where k is a parameter representing a discrete sampling time or adiscrete control time which is digitized with a first period ΔT1, andDTH(k) is a throttle valve opening deviation amount defined by theequation (2) shown below.

DTH(k)=TH(k)−THDEF  (2)

where TH is a detected throttle valve opening, and THDEF is the defaultopening.

In the equation (1), a1, a2, b1, and c1 are model parameters determiningthe characteristics of the controlled object model, and d is a deadtime. The dead time d is a delay between the input and output of thecontrolled object model. For reducing the amount of calculations, it iseffective to define a controlled object model by the equation (1a) shownbelow where the dead time d is set to “0”. A modeling error (adifference between the characteristics of the controlled object modeland the characteristics of an actual controlled object (plant)) causedby setting the dead time d to “0”, is compensated by employing a slidingmode controller having robustness. “Robustness” of a control systemmeans that control performance or control stability of the controlsystem is not easily deteriorated even when the characteristics of thecontrolled object or disturbances change largely compared with anordinary condition.

DTH(k+1)=a 1×DTH(k)+a 2×DTH(k−1)+b 1×DUT(k)+c 1  (1a)

In the equation (1a), the model parameter c1 which is not relevant tothe input and output of the controlled object, is employed in additionto the model parameters a1 and a2 which are relevant to the deviationDTH which is the output of the controlled object, and the modelparameter b1 which is relevant to the input duty ratio DUT which is theinput of the controlled object. The model parameter c1 is a parameterrepresenting a deviation amount of the default opening THDEF anddisturbance applied to the throttle valve actuating device 10. In otherwords, the default opening deviation amount and the disturbance can beidentified by identifying the model parameter c1 simultaneously with themodel parameters a1, a2, and b1 by a model parameter identifierdescribed below.

FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of the throttle valve controlsystem which is realized by the ECU 7. The throttle valve control systemincludes an adaptive sliding mode controller 21, a model parameteridentifier 22, a model parameter scheduler 25, a target opening settingunit 24 for setting a target opening THR for the throttle valve 3according to the accelerator pedal depression amount ACC, andsubtractors 26 and 27.

The adaptive sliding mode controller 21 calculates a duty ratio DUTaccording to an adaptive sliding mode control in order to make thedetected throttle valve opening TH coincide with the target opening THR,and outputs the calculated duty ratio DUT.

By using the adaptive sliding mode controller 21, it is possible tochange (specify) the response characteristics of the throttle valveopening TH to the target opening THR, using a specific parameter (aswitching function setting parameter VPOLE to be described later). As aresult, an optimum response characteristic can be specified according tothe throttle valve opening TH. For example, it is possible to avoidshocks at the time the throttle valve 3 moves from an open position to afully closed position, i.e., at the time the throttle valve 3 collideswith a stopper for stopping the throttle valve 3 at the fully closedposition. It is also possible to make the engine response correspondingto the operation of the accelerator pedal variable. Further, the slidingmode control makes it possible to obtain a good stability against errorsof the model parameters.

The model parameter identifier 22 calculates a corrected model parametervector θL (θL^(T)=[a1, a2, b1, c1]) and supplies the calculatedcorrected model parameter vector θL to the adaptive sliding modecontroller 21. More specifically, the model parameter identifier 22calculates a model parameter vector θ based on the throttle valveopening TH and the duty ratio DUT. The model parameter identifier 22then carries out a first limit process, an oversampling andmoving-averaging process, and a second limit process of the modelparameter vector θ to calculate a corrected model parameter vector θL.The corrected model parameter vector θL is supplied to the adaptivesliding mode controller 21. In this manner, the model parameters a1, a2,and b1 which are optimum for making the throttle valve opening TH followup the target opening THR are obtained., and also the model parameter c1indicative of disturbance and a deviation amount of the default openingTHDEF is obtained. The first limit process, the oversampling andmoving-averaging process, and the second limit process will be describedlater.

By using the model parameter identifier 22 for identifying the modelparameters on a real-time basis, adaptation to changes in engineoperating conditions, compensation for hardware characteristicsvariations, compensation for power supply voltage fluctuations, andadaptation to aging-dependent changes of hardware characteristics arepossible.

The model parameter scheduler 25 calculates a reference model parametervector θ base (θbase^(T)=[a1base, a2base, b1base, c1base]) according toa target value DTHR which is defined as a deviation amount between atarget opening THR(k) and the default opening THDEF by the followingequation (3), the calculated reference model parameter vector θ base issupplied to the model parameter identifier 22.

DTHR(k)=THR(k)−THDEF  (3)

The subtractor 26 calculates a deviation amount between the defaultopening THDEF and the throttle valve opening TH as the throttle valveopening deviation amount DTH, and the subtractor 27 calculates adeviation amount between the default opening THDEF and the targetopening THR as the target value DTHR (see the equations (2) and (3)).

Outline of the Adaptive Sliding Mode Controller

Principles of operation of the adaptive sliding mode controller 21 willbe described below.

If a deviation e(k) between the throttle valve opening deviation amountDTH and the target value DTHR is defined by the following equation (4),then a switching function value σ(k) of the adaptive sliding modecontroller is set by the following equation (5).

e(k)=DTH(k)−DTHR(k)  (4)

σ(k)=e(k)+VPOLE×e(k−1)=(DTH(k)−DTHR(k))+VPOLE×(DTH(k−1)−DTHR(k−1))  (5)

where VPOLE is a switching function setting parameter that is set to avalue greater than “−1” and less than “1”.

On a phase plane defined by a vertical axis representing a deviatione(k) and a horizontal axis representing a preceding deviation e(k−1), apair of the deviation e(k) and the preceding deviation e(k−1) satisfyingthe equation of “σ(k)=0” represents a straight line. The straight lineis generally referred to as a switching straight line. A sliding modecontrol is a control contemplating the behavior of the deviation e(k) onthe switching straight line. The sliding mode control is carried out sothat the switching function value σ(k) becomes “0”, i.e., the pair ofthe deviation e(k) and the preceding deviation e(k−1) exists on theswitching straight line on the phase plane, to thereby achieve a robustcontrol against disturbance and the modeling error. As a result, thethrottle valve opening deviation amount DTH is controlled with goodrobustness to follow up the target value DTHR.

As shown in FIG. 3, by changing the value of the switching functionsetting parameter VPOLE in the equation (5), it is possible to change adamping characteristic of the deviation e(k), i.e., the follow-upcharacteristic of the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTH tofollow up the target value DTHR. Specifically, if VPOLE equals “−1”,then the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTH completely fails tofollow up the target value DTHR. As the absolute value of the switchingfunction setting parameter VPOLE is reduced, the speed at which thethrottle valve opening deviation amount DTH follows up the target valueDTHR increases. Since the sliding mode controller is capable ofspecifying the damping characteristic of the deviation e(k) as a desiredcharacteristic, the sliding mode controller is referred to as aresponse-specifying controller.

According to the sliding mode control, the converging speed can easilybe changed by changing the switching function setting parameter VPOLE.Therefore, in the present embodiment, the switching function settingparameter VPOLE is set according to the throttle valve opening deviationamount DTH to obtain a response characteristic suitable for theoperating condition of the throttle valve 3.

As described above, according to the sliding mode control, the deviatione(k) is converged to “0” at an indicated speed and robustly againstdisturbance and the modeling error by constraining the pair of thedeviation e(k) and the preceding deviation e(k−1) on the switchingstraight line (the pair of e(k) and e(k−1) will be referred to as“deviation state quantity”). Therefore, in the sliding mode control, itis important how to place the deviation state quantity onto theswitching straight line and constrain the deviation state quantity onthe switching straight line.

From the above standpoint, an input DUT(k) (also indicated as Usl(k)) tothe controlled object (an output of the controller) is basicallycalculated as a sum of an equivalent control input Ueq(k), a reachinglaw input Urch(k), and an adaptive law input Uadp(k) by the followingequation (6).

DUT(k)=Usl(k)=Ueq(k)+Urch(k)+Uadp(k)  (6)

The equivalent control input Ueq(k) is an input for constraining thedeviation state quantity on the switching straight line. The reachinglaw input Urch(k) is an input for placing the deviation state quantityonto the switching straight line. The adaptive law input Uadp(k) is aninput for placing the deviation state quantity onto the switchingstraight line while reducing the modeling error and the effect ofdisturbance. Methods of calculating these inputs Ueq(k), Urch(k), andUadp(k) will be described below.

Since the equivalent control input Ueq(k) is an input for constrainingthe deviation state quantity on the switching straight line, a conditionto be satisfied is given by the following equation (7).

σ(k)=σ(k+1)  (7)

Using the equations (1), (4), and (5), the duty ratio DUT(k) satisfyingthe equation (7) is determined by the equation (8) shown below. The dutyratio DUT(k) calculated with the equation (8) represents the equivalentcontrol input Ueq(k). The reaching law input Urch(k) and the adaptivelaw input Uadp(k) are defined by the respective equations (9) and (10)shown below. $\begin{matrix}\begin{matrix}{{{DUT}(k)} = {\frac{1}{b1}\left\{ {{\left( {1 - {a1} - {VPOLE}} \right){{DTH}(k)}} +} \right.}} \\{{{\left( {{VPOLE} - {a2}} \right){{DTH}\left( {k - 1} \right)}} - {c1} + {{DTHR}\left( {k + 1} \right)} +}} \\\left. {{\left( {{VPOLE} - 1} \right){{DTHR}(k)}} - {{VPOLE} \times {{DTHR}\left( {k - 1} \right)}}} \right\} \\{= {{Ueq}(k)}}\end{matrix} & (8) \\{{{Urch}(k)} = {\frac{- F}{b1}{\sigma (k)}}} & (9) \\{{{Uadp}(k)} = {\frac{- G}{b1}{\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{k}{\Delta \quad {T1}\quad {\sigma (i)}}}}} & (10)\end{matrix}$

where F and G represent respectively a reaching law control gain and anadaptive law control gain, which are set as described below, and ΔT1represents a control period. The control period is the first period ΔT1which is equal to a sampling period that is used to define thecontrolled object model.

Then, the reaching law control gain F and the adaptive law control gainG are determined so that the deviation state quantity can stably beplaced onto the switching straight line by the reaching law input Urchand the adaptive law input Uadp.

Specifically, a disturbance V(k) is assumed, and a stability conditionfor keeping the switching function value σ(k) stable against thedisturbance V(k) is determined to obtain a condition for setting thegains F and G. As a result, it has been obtained as the stabilitycondition that the combination of the gains F and G satisfies thefollowing equations (11) through (13), in other words, the combinationof the gains F and G should be located in a hatched region shown in FIG.4.

F>0  (11)

G>0  (12)

F<2−(ΔT 1/2)G  (13)

As described above, the equivalent control input Ueq(k), the reachinglaw input Urch(k), and the adaptive law input Uadp(k) are calculatedfrom the equations (8) through (10), and the duty ratio DUT(k) iscalculated as a sum of those inputs.

Outline of the Model Parameter Identifier

Principles of operation of the model parameter identifier 22 will bedescribed below.

The model parameter identifier 22 calculates a model parameter vector ofthe controlled object model, based on the input (DUT(k)) and output(TH(k)) of the controlled object, as described above. Specifically, themodel parameter identifier 22 calculates a model parameter vector θ(k)according to a sequential identifying algorithm (generalized sequentialmethod-of-least-squares algorithm) represented by the following equation(14).

θ(k)=θ(k−1)+KP(k)ide(k)  (14)

θ(k)^(T) =[a 1″, a 2″, b 1″, c 1″]  (15)

where a1″, a2″, b1″, and c1″ represent model parameters before a firstlimit process, described later, is carried out, ide(k) represents anidentifying error defined by the equations (16), (17), and (18) shownbelow, where DTHHAT(k) represents an estimated value of the throttlevalve opening deviation amount DTH(k) (hereinafter referred to as“estimated throttle valve opening deviation amount”) which is calculatedusing the latest model parameter vector θ(k−1), and KP(k) represents again coefficient vector defined by the equation (19) shown below. In theequation (19), P(k) represents a quartic square matrix calculated by theequation (20) shown below.

ide(k)=DTH(k)−DTHHAT(k)  (16)

DTHHAT(k)=θ(k−1)^(T)ζ(k)  (17)

ζ(k)^(T) =[DTH(k−1), DTH(k−2), DUT(k−1), 1]  (18)

$\begin{matrix}{{{KP}(k)} = \frac{{P(k)}{\zeta (k)}}{1 + {{\zeta^{T}(k)}{P(k)}{\zeta (k)}}}} & (19) \\{{P\left( {k + 1} \right)} = {\frac{1}{\lambda_{1}}\left( {E - \frac{\lambda_{2}{P(k)}{\zeta (k)}{\zeta^{T}(k)}}{\lambda_{1} + {\lambda_{2}{\zeta^{T}(k)}{P(k)}{\zeta (k)}}}} \right){P(k)}}} & (20)\end{matrix}$

In accordance with the setting of coefficients λ1 and λ2 in the equation(20), the identifying algorithm from the equations (14) through (20)becomes one of the following four identifying algorithm:

λ 1 = 1, λ 2 = 0 Fixed gain algorithm λ 1 = 1, λ 2 = 1Method-of-least-squares algorithm λ 1 = 1, λ 2 = λ Degressive gainalgorithm (λ is a given value other than 0 or 1) λ 1 = λ, λ2 = 1Weighted Method-of-least- squares algorithm (λ is a given value otherthan 0 or 1)

If the fixed gain algorithm is used to reduce the amount ofcalculations, then the equation (19) is simplified into the followingequation (19a) where P represents a square matrix with constants asdiagonal elements. $\begin{matrix}{{{KP}(k)} = \frac{P\quad {\zeta (k)}}{1 + {{\zeta^{T}(k)}P\quad {\zeta (k)}}}} & \text{(19a)}\end{matrix}$

There are situations where model parameters calculated from theequations (14) through (18), (19a) gradually shifts from desired values.Specifically, as shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B, if a residual identifyingerror caused by nonlinear characteristics such as frictioncharacteristics of the throttle valve exists after the model parametershave been converged to a certain extent, or if a disturbance whoseaverage value is not zero is steadily applied, then the residualidentifying errors are accumulated, causing a drift in the modelparameter. To prevent such a drift of the model parameters, the modelparameter vector θ(k) is calculated by the following equation (14a)instead of the equation (14).

θ(k)=θ(0)+DELTA^(k−1) ×KP(1)ide(1)+DELTA^(k−2)×KP(2)ide(2)++DELTA×KP(k−1)ide(k−1)+KP(k)ide(k)  (14a)

where DELTA represents a forgetting coefficient matrix in which theforgetting coefficient δi (i=1 through 3) and “1” are diagonal elementsand other elements are all “0”, as shown by the following equation (21).$\begin{matrix}{{DELTA} = \begin{bmatrix}{\delta 1} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\0 & {\delta 2} & 0 & 0 \\0 & 0 & {\delta 3} & 0 \\0 & 0 & 0 & 1\end{bmatrix}} & (21)\end{matrix}$

The forgetting coefficient δi is set to a value between “0” and “1”(0<δi<1) and has a function to gradually reduce the effect of pastidentifying errors. In the equation (21), the coefficient which isrelevant to the calculation of the model parameter c1″ is set to “1”,holding the effect of past values. By setting one of the diagonalelements of the forgetting coefficient matrix DELTA, i.e., thecoefficient which is relevant to the calculation of the model parameterc1″, to “1”, it is possible to prevent a steady deviation between thetarget value DTHR and the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTH.The model parameters are prevented from drifting by setting otherelements δ1, δ2, and δ3 of the forgetting coefficient matrix DELTA to avalue which is greater than “0” and less than “1”.

When the equation (14a) is rewritten into a recursive form, thefollowing equations (14b) and (14c) are obtained. A process ofcalculating the model parameter vector θ(k) using the equations (14b)and (14c) rather than the equation (14) is hereinafter referred to as “δcorrecting method”, and dθ(k) defined by the equation (14c) is referredto as “updating vector”.

θ(k)=θ(0)+dθ(k)  (14b)

dθ(k)=DELTA·dθ(k−1)+KP(k)ide(k)  (14c)

According to an algorithm using the δ correcting method, in addition tothe drift preventing effect, a model parameter stabilizing effect can beobtained. Specifically, an initial vector θ(0) is maintained at alltimes, and values which can be taken by the elements of the updatingvector dθ(k) are limited by the effect of the forgetting coefficientmatrix DELTA. Therefore, the model parameters can be stabilized in thevicinity of their initial values.

Furthermore, since model parameters are calculated while adjusting theupdating vector dθ(k) according to identifying process based on theinput and output data of the actual controlled object, it is possible tocalculate model parameters that match the actual controlled object.

It is preferable to calculate the model parameter vector θ(k) from thefollowing equation (14d) which uses a reference model parameter vector θbase instead of the initial vector θ(0) in the equation (14b).

θ(k)=θbase+dθ(k)  (14d)

The reference model parameter vector θ base is set according to thetarget value DTHR by the model parameter scheduler 25. Consequently, thereference model parameter vector θ base can be adapted to changes in thedynamic characteristics which correspond to changes in the throttlevalve opening TH.

Further, in the present embodiment, the identifying error ide(k) issubjected to a low-pass filtering. Specifically, when identifying themodel parameters of a controlled object which has low-passcharacteristics, the identifying weight of the identifying algorithm forthe identifying error ide(k) has frequency characteristics as indicatedby the solid line L1 in FIG. 6A. By the low-pass filtering of theidentifying error ide(k), the frequency characteristics as indicated bythe solid line L1 are changed to frequency characteristics as indicatedby the broken line L2 where the high-frequency components areattenuated. The reason for executing the low-pass filtering will bedescribed below.

The frequency characteristics of the actual controlled object havinglow-pass characteristics and the controlled object model thereof havefrequency characteristics represented respectively by the solid lines L3and L4 in FIG. 6B. Specifically, if model parameters are identified bythe model parameter identifier 22 with respect to the controlled objectwhich has low-pass characteristics (characteristics of attenuatinghigh-frequency components), the identified model parameters are largelyaffected by the high-frequency-rejection characteristics, so that thegain of the controlled object model becomes lower than actualcharacteristics in a low-frequency range. As a result, the sliding modecontroller 21 excessively corrects the control input.

By changing the frequency characteristics of the weighting of theidentifying algorithm to the characteristics indicated by the brokenline L2 in FIG. 6A according to the low-pass filtering, the frequencycharacteristics of the controlled object are changed to frequencycharacteristics indicated by the broken line L5 in FIG. 6B. As a result,the frequency characteristics of the controlled object model is made tocoincide with the actual frequency characteristics, or the low frequencygain of the controlled object model is corrected to a level which isslightly higher than the actual gain. Accordingly, it is possible toprevent the control input from being excessively corrected by thesliding mode controller 21, to thereby improve the robustness of thecontrol system and further stabilize the control system.

The low-pass filtering is carried out by storing past values ide(k−i) ofthe identifying error (e.g., 10 past values for i=1 through 10) in aring buffer, multiplying the past values by weighting coefficients, andadding the products of the past values and the weighting coefficients.

Since the identifying error ide(k) is calculated from the equations(16), (17), and (18), the same effect as described above can be obtainedby performing the same low-pass filtering on the throttle valve openingdeviation amount DTH(k) and the estimated throttle valve openingdeviation amount DTHHAT(k), or by performing the same low-pass filteringon the throttle valve opening deviation amounts DTH(k−1), DTH(k−2) andthe duty ratio DUT(k−1).

When the identifying error which has been subjected to the low-passfiltering is represented by idef(k), then the updating vector dθ(k) iscalculated from the following equation (14e) instead of the equation(14c).

dθ(k)=DELTA×dθ(k−1)+KP(k)idef(k)  (14e)

Review of the Sampling Period

It has been confirmed by the inventors of the present invention that ifthe first period ΔT1 which corresponds to the sampling period andcontrol period of the controlled object model is set to a fewmilliseconds (e.g., 2 milliseconds), then the performance of suppressingdisturbance becomes insufficient and the performance of adapting tovariations and time-dependent changes of the hardware characteristicsbecomes insufficient. These problems will be described below in detail.

1) Insufficient Performance of Suppressing Disturbance

The equivalent control input Ueq which is calculated from the equation(8) is a feed-forward input for making the throttle valve openingdeviation amount DTH follow the target value DTHR. Therefore, it is thereaching law input Urch(k) and the adaptive law input Uadp(k) calculatedfrom the equations (9) and (10) that contributes to suppressing theeffect of disturbances (e.g., changes in the friction force applied to amember which supports the valve body of the throttle valve 3, or changesin the pressure applied to the valve body, i.e., the pressure applied tothe valve body due to the difference between the pressures acting onboth sides of the valve body). The reaching law input Urch(k) and theadaptive law input Uadp(k) are calculated based on the switchingfunction value σ.

When setting the first period ΔT1 to a value of about a fewmilliseconds, the present value e(k) and preceding value e(k−1) of thecontrol deviation are substantially equal to each other, if a changerate of the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTH or the targetvalue DTHR is low. Therefore, if the switching function settingparameter VPOLE in the equation (5) is set to a value close to “−1”,then the switching function value σ(k) becomes substantially “0”. As aresult, the reaching law input Urch(k) and the adaptive law inputUadp(k) calculated from the equations (9) and (10) become substantially“0”, resulting in a large reduction in the disturbance suppressingperformance of an adaptive sliding mode controller. That is, if acontrolled object model is defined using a short sampling periodcompared with the change rate (change period) of the output of thecontrolled object model, then the disturbance suppressing performance ofan adaptive sliding mode controller designed based on the controlledobject model becomes greatly reduced.

2) Insufficient Performance of Adapting to Variations and Aging of theHardware Characteristics

Adaptation to variations and aging of the hardware characteristics iscarried out by sequentially identifying model parameters with the modelparameter identifier 22.

If the first period ΔT1 is set to a value of about a few milliseconds,then the sampling frequency is a few hundreds Hz (e.g., about 500 Hz),and the Nyquist frequency fnyq is one-half the sampling frequency. Mostof the frequency components of the throttle valve opening deviationamount DTH and the target value DTHR which are the output from thethrottle valve actuating device 10 exist in a frequency rangeconsiderably lower than the Nyquist frequency fnyq as shown in FIG. 7 (afrequency range below 5 Hz). In FIG. 7, Φth represents a power spectrum.Therefore, if a parameter which changes at a low rate is sampled atintervals of a relatively short period, as shown in FIG. 8, then anamount of change in the parameter cannot be observed. That is, thepresent value DTH(k) and the preceding value DTH(k−1) of the throttlevalve opening deviation amount are substantially equal to each other.

When identifying model parameters using such detected data, a sum of theidentified model parameters a1″ and a2″ becomes substantially “1”, andeach of the model parameters b1″ and c1″ becomes “0”. Thus, theidentified model parameters do not accurately represent the dynamiccharacteristics of the controlled object.

As described above, if the model parameters are identified based on datasampled at intervals of a relatively short sampling period compared withthe change rate (change period) of the output of the controlled objectmodel, then the accuracy of the identified model parameters becomesgreatly lowered, and the performance of adapting to variations and agingof the characteristics of the controlled object becomes insufficient.

If the sampling period is too long, then the Nyquist frequency fnyqapparently becomes too low, resulting in a reduction in controllability.However, it has been considered so far that no problem occurs due to arelatively short sampling period. The inventors of the present inventionhave made it clear that the controllability becomes reduced because ofthe short sampling period, if a control contemplating changes in thestate of the controlled object is performed.

According to the present embodiment, the above problem is solved bymaking the sampling period of the controlled object longer according tothe operating frequency range of the controlled object. On the otherhand, it is empirically known that the controllability against nonlineardisturbances such as friction increases as the control period isshortened. Accordingly, the first period ΔT1 set to about a fewmillimeters is employed as a control period of the adaptive sliding modecontroller, and the sampling period that is used to define thecontrolled object model is set to a second period ΔT2 which is longerthan the first period ΔT1.

For example, if an upper-limit cut-off frequency of the operatingfrequency range of the controlled object operates is 1 Hz, then aminimum sampling frequency for observing motions of the controlledobject is 2 Hz according to the sampling theorem. It has experimentallybeen confirmed that the highest sampling frequency for accuratelyidentifying model parameters of a model which represents motions of thecontrolled object is about 20 Hz. Therefore, the sampling period that isused to define the controlled object model should preferably be set to aperiod corresponding to a frequency which is 3 times to 30 times theupper-limit cut-off frequency of the operating frequency range of thecontrolled object.

If Nyquist frequencies corresponding to the first period ΔT1 and thesecond period ΔT2 are fnyq1 and fnyq2, respectively, then theirrelationship is shown in FIG. 9. In FIG. 9, fsmp2 represents a samplingfrequency corresponding to the second period ΔT2.

If the sampling frequency is set to a value which is shorter than aperiod corresponding to a frequency which is 30 times the upper-limitcut-off frequency, then the above-described problem occurs. If thesampling frequency is set to a value which is longer than a periodcorresponding to a frequency which is 3 times the upper-limit cut-offfrequency, then the Nyquist frequency becomes too low for the operatingfrequency range of the controlled object, resulting in reducedcontrollability.

Further, in the present embodiment, the period of the identifyingoperation of the model parameter identifier is set to a period which isequal to the second period ΔT2.

If a discrete sampling time or s discrete control time which isdigitized with the second period ΔT2 is indicated by “n”, then theabove-described equation (1a) for defining the controlled object modelis rewritten to the equation (1b) shown below. Similarly, theabove-described equations (3), (4), and (5) are rewritten to theequations (3a), (4a), and (5a) shown below. The controlled object modelwhich is defined by the equation (1b) will hereinafter referred to as“ΔT2 model”, and the controlled object model which is defined by theequation (1a) as “ΔT1 model”.

DTH(n+1)=a 1×DTH(n)+a 2×DTH(n−1)+b 1×DUT(n)+c 1  (1b)

DTHR(n)=THR(n)−THDEF  (3a)

e(n)=DTH(n)−DTHR(n)  (4a)

σ(n)=e(n)+VPOLE×e(n−1)=(DTH(n)−DTHR(n))+VPOLE×(DTH(n−1)−DTHR(n−1))  (5a)

The effect that lengthening the sampling period has on the switchingfunction value σ will be described below. In order for the dampingcharacteristic of the deviation e(k) in the ΔT1 model and the dampingcharacteristic of the deviation e(n) in the ΔT2 model to be identical toeach other on graphs whose horizontal axes represent time t as shown inFIGS. 10A and 10B, the value of the switching function setting parameterVPOLE may be set as follows when the second period ΔT2 is set to a valuethat is five times the first period ΔT1.

VPOLE of the ΔT 1 model=−0.9

VPOLE of the ΔT 2 model=−0.59

If the switching function setting parameter VPOLE is thus set, and thethrottle valve opening deviation amount DTH is vibrated by alow-frequency sine-wave disturbance as shown in FIG. 11, then theswitching function values σ of the above two models change as shown inFIG. 12. Switching functions which are set so that the dampingcharacteristics of the deviation e become identical, have differentvalues with respect to the same disturbance. Specifically, the switchingfunction value σ(n) of the ΔT2 model is larger than the switchingfunction value σ(k) of the ΔT1 model. It is thus confirmed that thesensitivity of the switching function value σ to disturbance isincreased by lowering the sampling frequency. Consequently, theperformance of suppressing disturbance can be improved by using theswitching function value σ(n) whose sensitivity to disturbance isincreased.

Redesigning of Adaptive Sliding Mode Controller Based on ΔT2 Model

The adaptive sliding mode controller is redesigned based on the ΔT2model. The output of the adaptive sliding mode controller is expressedby the following equation (6a).

DUT(n)=Usl(n)=Ueq(n)+Urch(n)+Uadp(n)  (6a)

An equivalent control input Ueq(n) is obtained by replacing “k” with “n”in the equation (8). Since it is actually difficult to obtain a futurevalue DTHR(n+1) of the target value, the equivalent control input Ueq(n)is calculated by the following equation (8a) from which the termrelative to the target value DTHR is removed. It has experimentally beenconfirmed that the controller may become unstable if only the term ofthe future value DTHR(n+1) is removed and the present target valueDTHR(n) and the preceding target value DTHR(n−1) are left. Therefore,the present target value DTHR(n) and the preceding target valueDTHR(n−1) are also removed from the equation (8a).

The reaching law input Urch(n) and the adaptive law input Uadp(n) arecalculated respectively from the equations (9a), (10a) shown below.$\begin{matrix}{{{Ueq}(n)} = {\frac{1}{b1}\left\{ {{\left( {1 - {a1} - {VPOLE}} \right){{DTH}(n)}} + {\left( {{VPOLE} - {a2}} \right){{DTH}\left( {n - 1} \right)}} - {c1}} \right\}}} & \left( {8a} \right) \\{{{{Urch}(n)} = {\frac{- F}{b1}{\sigma (n)}}}\quad} & \left( {9a} \right) \\{{{{Uadp}(n)} = {\frac{- G}{b1}{\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{n}{\Delta \quad {T2}\quad {\sigma (i)}}}}}\quad} & \left( {10a} \right)\end{matrix}$

The gains F and G of the reaching law input Urch(n) and the adaptive lawinput Uadp(n) should preferably be set according to the switchingfunction value σ(n) as shown in FIG. 13A. By setting the gains F and Gas shown in FIG. 13A, the gains F and G decrease as the absolute valueof the switching function value σ(n) increases. Accordingly, thethrottle valve opening deviation amount DTH is prevented fromovershooting with respect to the target value DTHR even when the targetvalue DTHR abruptly changes.

Instead of setting the gains F and G as shown in FIG. 13A, the gains Fand G may be set according to the deviation e(n) or the throttle valveopening deviation amount DTH(n), as shown in FIG. 13B or FIG. 13C. Ifthe gains F and G are set according to the deviation e(n) as shown inFIG. 13B, then the gains F and G decrease as the absolute value of thedeviation e(n) increases. Accordingly, the throttle valve openingdeviation amount DTH is prevented from overshooting with respect to thetarget value DTHR even when the target value DTHR abruptly changes.

If the gains F and G are set according to the throttle valve openingdeviation amount DTH(n) as shown in FIG. 13C, then the controllabilitycan be improved when the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTH(n)is in the vicinity of “0”, i.e., when the throttle valve opening TH isin the vicinity of the default opening THDEF.

The gains F and G that are made variable raises the following problem:When the gain F or G changes stepwise due to a stepwise change in aparameter which determines the gain F or G as shown in FIG. 14B, thereaching law input Urch or the adaptive law input Uadp abruptly changesas indicated by the broken line in FIG. 14A, which may cause an abruptchange in the throttle valve opening TH. Therefore, the reaching lawinput Urch and the adaptive law input Uadp may be calculatedrespectively from the equations (9b) and (10b) instead of the equations(9a) and (10a). The reaching law input Urch and the adaptive law inputUadp thus calculated change gradually as indicated by the solid line inFIG. 14A even when the gains F and G abruptly change.

Urch(n)=Urch(n−1)−(F/b 1)(σ(n)−σ(n−1))  (9b)

 Uadp(n)=Uadp(n−1)−(GΔT 2/b 1)×σ(n)  (10b)

Review of the Calculation Period

If the second period ΔT2 is used as a sampling period for the controlledobject model, then, as shown in FIGS. 15A through 15C, the controlperiod is usually also set to the second period ΔT2 that is longer thanthe first period ΔT1. The longer control period, however, causes thefollowing problems:

1) A better controllability is obtained by detecting and correcting assoon as possible an error of the output with respect to the targetvalue, when the error is generated by a nonlinear disturbance such asfriction of the actuating mechanism of the throttle valve. If thesampling period is made longer, then the detection of the error isdelayed, resulting in low controllability.

2) When making the control period longer, the period of inputting thetarget value into the controller becomes longer. Therefore, the deadtime in making the output follow up a change in the target value alsobecomes longer. Changes in the target value at a high frequency (highspeed) cannot be reflected to the output.

Therefore, in the present embodiment, the adaptive sliding modecontroller 21, the model parameter identifier 22, and the modelparameter scheduler 25 are constructed based on a model which is definedusing the second period ΔT2 as a sampling period. The adaptive slidingmode controller 21 calculates a control input at intervals of the firstperiod ΔT1, the model parameter identifier 22 identifies a modelparameter vector θ at intervals of the second period ΔT2, and the modelparameter scheduler 25 calculates a reference model parameter vector θbase at intervals of the second period ΔT2.

FIGS. 16A through 16D are timing charts illustrating calculation timingsof the parameters described above, when the second period ΔT2 is set toa value five times the first period ΔT2 (ΔT2=5ΔT1). In FIGS. 16A through16D, a model parameter vector θ(n−1) is calculated based on throttlevalve opening deviation amounts DTH at time (n−1) (=time (k−5)) and time(n−2) (=time (k−10)), a control input DUT at time (n−1), and a targetvalue DTHR at time (n−1), using a reference model parameter vectorθbase(n−1) at time (n−1). A control input DUT(k−5) is calculated usingtarget values DTHR(k−5) and DTHR(k−10), throttle valve opening deviationamounts DTH(k−5) and DTH(k−10), and the model parameter vector θ(n−1). Acontrol input DUT(k−4) is calculated using target values DTHR(k−4) andDTHR(k−9), throttle valve opening deviation amounts DTH(k−4) andDTH(k−9), and the model parameter vector θ(n−1). A control inputDUT(k−3) is calculated using target values DTHR(k−3) and DTHR(k−8),throttle valve opening deviation amounts DTH(k−3) and DTH(k−8), and themodel parameter vector θ(n−1).

When employing the above calculation timings, the period of updatingmodel parameters which are used to calculate the control input DUTbecomes longer than the period of updating the control input DUT by thecontroller 21. As a result, the period of updating model parametersaffects the control input DUT, which may possibly cause resonance in thecontrol system.

Therefore, in the present embodiment, such resonance in the controlsystem is prevented by sampling (oversampling) model parameters whichare identified intervals of the second period ΔT2, at intervals of thefirst period ΔT1 which is the control period, storing the sampled datain a ring buffer, and using values obtained by effecting amoving-averaging process on the data stored in the ring buffer as modelparameters for the control.

FIG. 17 is a timing chart illustrating the above calculation sequence.FIG. 17, similar to FIGS. 16A through 16D, shows a case where ΔT2 equals5ΔT1. In the illustrated example, the latest nine oversampled data areaveraged. Specifically, model parameters obtained by averaging threemodel parameter vectors θ(n−2), five model parameter vectors θ(n−1), andone model parameter vector θ(n), are used in a calculation carried outby the sliding mode controller at time k. At another time, e.g., at time(k−3), model parameters obtained by averaging one model parameter vectorθ(n−3), five model parameter vectors θ(n−2), and three model parametervectors θ(n−1), are used in a calculation carried out by the slidingmode controller.

A model parameter vector θ′ shown in FIG. 17 represents a modelparameter vector which has been subjected to a first limit process andan oversampling and moving-averaging process to be described later.

Details of the Adaptive Sliding Mode Controller

Details of the adaptive sliding mode controller 21 will be describedbelow. The controlled object model is a model which is defined using thesecond period ΔT2. As a calculation period of the adaptive sliding modecontroller 21, the first period ΔT1 rather than the second period ΔT2 isemployed as described above. Accordingly, time “k” rather than time “n”is used as a discrete time.

In the present embodiment, a control input DUT(k) is calculated from theequation (6b) instead of the equation (6a) in order to improve theresponse to small changes in the target value DTHR and reduce theovershooting of the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTH withrespect to the target value DTHR. In the equation (6b), the controlinput DUT(k) is calculated using a nonlinear input Unl(k), a forcedvibration input Uwave(k), and a damping input Udamp(k) in addition tothe equivalent control input Ueq(k), the reaching law input Urch(k), andthe adaptive law input Uadp(k).

DUT(k)=Usl(k)=Ueq(k)+Urch(k)+Uadp(k)+Unl(k)+Uwave(k)+Udamp(k)  (6b)

In the equation (6b), the equivalent control input Ueq(k), the reachinglaw input Urch(k), and the adaptive law input Uadp(k) are calculatedfrom the following equations (8b), (9), and (10c), and the switchingfunction value σ(k) is calculated from the following equation (5b).$\begin{matrix}{{{Ueq}(k)} = {\frac{1}{b1}\left\{ {{\left( {1 - {a1} - {VPOLE}} \right){{DTH}(k)}} + {\left( {{VPOLE} - {a2}} \right){{DTH}\left( {k - {k0}} \right)}} - {c1}} \right\}}} & \left( {8b} \right) \\{{{{Urch}(k)} = {\frac{- F}{b1}{\sigma (k)}}}\quad} & (9) \\{{{{Uadp}(k)} = {{{Uadp}\left( {k - 1} \right)} - {\frac{G}{b1}\Delta \quad {T1} \times \sigma \quad (k)}}}\quad} & \left( {10c} \right) \\{{\sigma (k)} = {{{e(k)} + {{VPOLE} \times {e\left( {k - {k0}} \right)}}} = {{{DTH}(k)} - {{DTHR}(k)} + {{VPOLE} \times \left( {{{DTH}\left( {k - {k0}} \right)} - {{DTHR}\left( {k - {k0}} \right)}} \right)}}}} & \left( {5b} \right) \\\quad & \quad\end{matrix}$

In the equations (5b) and (8b), k0 represents a parameter correspondingto a sampling time interval of the deviation e(k) involved in thecalculation of the switching function value σ. In the presentembodiment, the parameter k0 is set to (ΔT2/ΔT1) (e.g., “5”)corresponding to the second period ΔT2. By setting the sampling timeinterval of the deviation e(k) involved in the calculation of theswitching function value σ to the second period ΔT2, it is possible tocalculate a switching function value suitable for a frequency range inwhich the characteristics of the controlled object model and thecharacteristics of the plant substantially coincide with each other. Asa result, the performance of suppressing disturbances and the modelingerror can be further improved.

Since the sampling period for the modeling is set to the second periodΔT2 and the control period is set to the first period ΔT1, the equations(5b), (8b), and (10c) are different from the above-described equations(5), (8a), and (10b).

The nonlinear input Unl is an input for suppressing a nonlinear modelingerror due to backlash of speed reduction gears for actuating the valvebody of the throttle valve 3, and placing the deviation state quantityonto the switching straight line. The forced vibration input Uwave is aninput for suppressing nonlinear characteristics due to friction of theactuating mechanism of the throttle valve 3. The damping input Udamp isan input for preventing the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTHfrom overshooting with respect to the target value DTHR.

First, the nonlinear input Unl will be described below.

In a throttle valve actuating device of the type which actuates a valvebody through speed reduction gears, a steady deviation due to backlashof the speed reduction gears as shown in FIG. 18 is generated when thetarget value DTHR is slightly changing, and a certain time period isrequired to eliminate the steady deviation. Particularly, such atendency grows after the direction of change in the target value DTHRand the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTH is reversed.

According to a controller using the equation (6a) which does not includethe nonlinear input Unl, the above steady deviation is converged to “0”by the adaptive law input Uadp and the model parameter c1 which areincluded in the equation (8) for calculating the equivalent controlinput Ueq. However, since the converging rate of the steady deviation islow, no sufficient controllability is obtained. FIG. 18 shows the mannerin which the adaptive law input Uadp changes, and the steady deviationis converged to “0”. According to a control process using the equation(6a), the steady deviation can be reduced to “0” by using at least oneof the adaptive law input Uadp and the model parameter c1.

In the present embodiment, a nonlinear input Unl(k) calculated from thefollowing equation (22) is used in order to solve the above problem.

Unl(k)=−Knl×sgn(σ(k))/b 1  (22)

where sgn(σ(k)) represents a sign function whose value equals “1” when σ(k) has a positive value, and equals “−1” when σ(k) has a negativevalue. Knl is a nonlinear input gain.

When the nonlinear input Unl(k) is used, the response to the targetvalue DTHR which is slightly changing is as shown in FIG. 19A, and thenonlinear input Unl(k) changes as shown in FIG. 19B. That is, theconvergence of the steady deviation is prevented from being delayed asshown in FIG. 18.

However, as understood from FIGS. 19A and 19B, a chattering phenomenonis caused by adding the nonlinear input Unl. This chattering phenomenon,which may be sometimes caused by the sliding mode controller, is notcaused when using the equation (6a). In the present embodiment, by usingthe adaptive law input Uadp and the model parameter c1 and using theforced vibration input Uwave, a modeling error to be compensated by thenonlinear input Unl is minimized, and hence the amplitude of thenonlinear input Unl, i.e., the amplitude of chattering, is minimized.

Further, in the present embodiment, the nonlinear input gain Knl is setaccording to the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTH as shown inFIG. 20. When the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTH is near“0”, i.e., when the throttle valve opening TH is near the defaultopening THDEF, a steady deviation is suppressed by increasing thenonlinear input gain Knl.

The forced vibration input Uwave will be described below.

In a controlled object, such as the throttle valve actuating device 10,the controllability with respect to minute changes of the target valuemay be lowered by the friction characteristics of sliding members foractuating the valve body of the throttle valve 3.

For compensating for the friction characteristics, there is known amethod of adding a dither input to the control input at intervals of apredetermined period. In the present embodiment, the forced vibrationinput Uwave is calculated as the dither input from the followingequation (23).

Uwave(k)=Kwave×Fwave(k)×|ide(n)|/b 1  (23)

where Kwave is a dither input basic gain, Fwave(k) is a dither signalvalue, and ide(n) is an identifying error of model parameters.

As a dither signal for obtaining the dither signal value Fwave, a seriesof a basic waveform shown in FIG. 21 is employed, and the repetitivefrequency thereof is set to a frequency which is not in the vicinity ofthe resonant frequency of the controlled object, as shown in FIG. 22, inorder to avoid resonance of the control system. In FIG. 22, frrepresents the resonant frequency of the control system, and fwaverepresents the frequency of the dither signal.

In a frequency range lower than the resonant frequency fr, the nonlinearinput Unl exhibits the same effect as the forced vibration input Uwave.Therefore, the dither signal frequency fwave is set to a frequencyhigher than the resonant frequency fr. More specifically, the dithersignal frequency fwave is set to a frequency within a rejectionfrequency band (outside a pass frequency band) of the controlled objectwhich has a low-pass characteristic (a characteristic which attenuateshigh-frequency components).

The forced vibration input Uwave, similar to the nonlinear input Unl,may become a cause of the chattering. Therefore, an amplitude of theforced vibration input Uwave should be set according to the frictioncharacteristics of the controlled object. However, the frictioncharacteristics of the throttle valve actuating device vary depending onthe characteristic variations and aging of hardware arrangements, andthe pressure acting on the valve body. Therefore, it is not appropriateto set the forced vibration input Uwave according to the throttle valveopening (throttle valve opening deviation amount), like the nonlinearinput Unl.

According to the present embodiment, in view of the fact that since thecontrolled object model is a linear model, the nonlinear characteristicssuch as friction characteristics are not reflected in the modelparameters, but appear as the identifying error ide, the amplitude ofthe forced vibration input Uwave is set according to the absolute valueof the identifying error ide, as indicated by the equation (23). In thismanner, it is possible to set the amplitude according to changes in thefriction characteristics.

FIGS. 23A through 23C are timing charts illustrating an effect of theforced vibration input (Uwave). At the time an excessive friction regionstarts (t1) and at the time the excessive friction region ends (t2), theidentifying error ide increases and hence the forced vibration inputUwave increases. Accordingly, a control error of the throttle valveopening deviation amount DTH is prevented from increasing.

The damping input Udamp will be described below.

In controlling the throttle valve actuating device, it is important toavoid a collision with a stopper when the valve body of the throttlevalve moves to a fully closed position. It is also important to preventthe engine drive power from increasing over a level which is greaterthan the driver's demand. The sliding mode control generally has ahigh-speed response characteristic, but has a tendency to often cause anovershoot with respect to the target value.

Therefore, in the present embodiment, the damping input Udamp is used asa control input for suppressing the overshoot.

It is considered that the damping input Udamp for suppressing theovershoot may be defined by the following three equations.

Udamp 1(k)=−Kdamp 1(e(k)−e(k−1))/b 1  (24)

Udamp 2(k)=−Kdamp 2(σ(k)−σ(k−1))/b 1  (25)

Udamp 3(k)=−Kdamp 3(DTH(k)−DTH(k−1))/b 1  (26)

where Kdamp1, Kdamp2, and Kdamp3 represent damping control gains.

The change rates of the deviation e(k) and the switching function valueσ(k) in the equations (24) and (25) become high either when the changerate of the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTH is high, or whenthe change rate of the target value DTHR is high. Therefore, theabsolute value of the damping input Udamp increases in the both cases.The damping input Udamp has a function for suppressing other controlinputs for converging the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTH tothe target value DTHR. Therefore, if the damping input Udamp1 or Udamp2defined by the equation (24) or (25) is employed, then control inputsfor following up the target value DTHR are suppressed when the targetvalue DTHR varies largely. As a result, the response speed becomeslower.

On the other hand, an absolute value of the damping input Udamp3 definedby the equation (26) increases to suppress other control inputs onlywhen the change rate of the throttle valve opening increases. In otherwords, the damping input Udamp3 does not suppress other control inputswhen the target value DTHR varies greatly. Therefore, the damping inputUdamp3 is capable of achieving both overshoot suppression and a highresponse speed, which cannot be achieved by the damping input Udamp1 orUdamp2 defined by the equation (24) or (25).

Accordingly, in the present embodiment, the damping input Udamp iscalculated form the following equation (27).

Udamp=−Kdamp(DTH(k)−DTH(k−1))/b 1  (27)

FIGS. 24A and 24B are timing charts illustrating an overshootsuppressing effect of the damping input Udamp, and show responsecharacteristics of the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTH whenthe target value DTHR is changed stepwise as indicated by the brokenlines. The overshoot shown in FIG. 24A is suppressed by the dampinginput Udamp as shown in FIG. 24B.

Since the equation (27) includes the model parameter b1, an overshootcan appropriately be suppressed even when the dynamic characteristics ofthe throttle valve actuating device 10 have changed.

With respect to the damping control gain Kdamp in the equation (27), thecontrollability can further be improved by changing the damping controlgain Kdamp according to the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTHand the target value DTHR. Therefore, in the present embodiment, a basicvalue Kdampbs is set according to the throttle valve opening deviationamount DTH as shown in FIG. 25A, and a correction coefficient Kkdamp iscalculated according to a moving average value DDTHRAV of amounts ofchange in the target value DTHR as shown in FIG. 25B. Further, thedamping control gain Kdamp is calculated from the equation (28) shownbelow. Since the basic value Kdampbs is set to a small value when thethrottle valve opening TH is in the vicinity of the default opening(DTH≅0), the damping effect is lowered, and a high response speed isobtained. When the moving average value DDTHRAV is equal to or greaterthan a predetermined positive value, the correction coefficient Kkdampis set to a value greater than “1”. This is because an overshoot isprone to occur when the throttle valve opening TH increases.

Kdamp=Kdampbs×Kkdamp  (28)

The moving average value DDTHRAV is calculated by the following equation(29):

 DDTHRAV(k)=Σ_(i=0) ^(iAV)(DTHR(k−i)=DTHR(k−i−1)/(iAV+1)   (29)

where iAV represents a number that is set to “50”, for example.

Details of the Model Parameter Identifier

Since the identifying process is carried out by the model parameteridentifier 22 at intervals of the second period ΔT2, equations obtainedby changing “k” in the equations shown in the description of the outlineof the model parameter identifier to “n” are given below. LF( ) in theequation (30) below represents the low-pass filtering of the identifyingerror in the form of a function.

θ(n)=θbase+dθ(n)  (14f)

dθ(n)=DELTA·dθ(n−1)+KP(n)idef(n)  (14g)

KP(n)=Pζ(n)/(1+ζ^(T)(n)Pζ(n))  (19b)

idef(n)=LF(ide(n))  (30)

ide(n)=DTH(n)−DTHHAT(n)  (16a)

DTHHAT(n)=θ(n−1)^(T)ζ(n)  (17a)

θ(n)^(T) =[a 1″(n), a 2″(n), b 1″(n), c 1″(n)]  (15a)

ζ(n)^(T) =[DTH(n−1), DTH(n−2), DUT(n−1), 1]  (18a)

$\begin{matrix}{{DELTA} = \begin{bmatrix}{\delta 1} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\0 & {\delta 2} & 0 & 0 \\0 & 0 & {\delta 3} & 0 \\0 & 0 & 0 & 1\end{bmatrix}} & (21)\end{matrix}$

The elements a1″, a2″, b1″, and c1″ of the model parameter vector θ(n)calculated by the equation (14f) are subjected to a limit processdescribed below in order to improve robustness of the control system.

FIGS. 26A and 26B are diagrams illustrating a limit process of the modelparameters a1″ and a2″. FIGS. 26A and 26B show a plane defined by thehorizontal axis of the model parameter a1″ and the vertical axis of themodel parameter a2″. If the model parameters a1″ and a2″ are locatedoutside a stable region which is indicated as a hatched region, then alimit process is performed to change them to values corresponding to anouter edge of the stable region.

If the model parameter b1″ falls outside a range between an upper limitvalue XIDB1H and a lower limit value XIDB1L, then a limit process isperformed to change the model parameter b1″ to the upper limit valueXIDB1H or the lower limit value XIDB1L. If the model parameter c1″ fallsoutside of a range between an upper limit value XIDC1H and a lower limitvalue XIDC1L, then a limit process is performed to change the modelparameter c1″ to the upper limit value XIDC1H or the lower limit valueXIDC1L.

A set of the above limit processes (first limit process) is expressed bythe equation (31) shown below. θ*(n) represents the limited modelparameter vector, whose elements are expressed by the equation (32)shown below.

θ*(n)=LMT(θ(n))  (31)

θ*(n)^(T) =[a 1*(n), a 2*(n), b 1*(n), c 1*(n)]  (32)

In a control system which was formerly proposed by the inventers of thepresent invention, the preceding updating vector dθ(n−1) which is usedto calculate the updating vector dθ(n) from the equation (14g) and thepreceding model parameter vector θ(n−1) which is used to calculate theestimated throttle valve opening deviation amount DTHHAT(k) includesmodel parameters that are not subjected to the limit process. In thepresent embodiment, a vector calculated by the equation (33) shown belowis used as the preceding updating vector dθ(n−1), and a limited modelparameter vector θ*(n−1) is used as the preceding model parameter vectorwhich is used to calculate the estimated throttle valve openingdeviation amount DTHHAT(k), as shown by the following equation (17b).

dθ(n−1)=θ*(n−1)−θbase(n−1)  (33)

DTHHAT(n)=θ*(n−1)^(T)ζ(n)  (17b)

The reasons for the above process are described below.

If a point corresponding to coordinates determined by the modelparameters a1″ and a2″ (hereinafter referred to as “model parametercoordinates”) is located at a point PA1 shown in FIG. 26B, then a limitprocess is performed to move a point corresponding to the modelparameter coordinates to a point PAL positioned on an outer edge of thestable region. If the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTHchanges and a point corresponding to the model parameter coordinates towhich the model parameters a1″ and a2″ are to be converged, changes to apoint PA2, then the movement from the point PA1 to the point PA2 isslower than the movement from the point PAL to the point PA2. That is,when the control process carried out by the adaptive sliding modecontroller 21 is adapted to the dynamic characteristics of thecontrolled object, a dead time is produced, which may lower thecontrollability.

Therefore, in the present embodiment, the limited model parameter vectorθ*(n−1) is applied to the equations (33) and (17b) to calculate thepresent model parameter vector θ(n).

A model parameter vector θ*(k) obtained at time k by oversampling themodel parameter vector θ*(n) after the first limit process at the time kis expressed by the following equation (32a).

θ*(k)^(T) =[a 1*(k), a 2*(k), b 1*(k), c 1*(k)]  (32a)

When a model parameter vector θ′(k) obtained by moving-averaging of theoversampled model parameter vector θ*(k) is expressed by the followingequation (32b), then elements a1′(k), a2′(k), b1′(k), and c1′(k) of themodel parameter vector θ′(k) are calculated by the following equations(34) through (37). $\begin{matrix}{{\theta^{\prime}(k)}^{T} = \left\lbrack {{{a1}^{\prime}(k)},{{a2}^{\prime}(k)},{{b1}^{\prime}(k)},{{c1}^{\prime}(k)}} \right\rbrack} & \left( {32b} \right) \\{{{a1}^{\prime}(k)} = {\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{m}{{a1}*{\left( {k - i} \right)/\left( {m + 1} \right)}}}} & (34) \\{{{a2}^{\prime}(k)} = {\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{m}{{a2}*{\left( {k - i} \right)/\left( {m + 1} \right)}}}} & (35) \\{{{b1}^{\prime}(k)} = {\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{m}{{b1}*{\left( {k - i} \right)/\left( {m + 1} \right)}}}} & (36) \\{{{c1}^{\prime}(k)} = {\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{m}{{c1}*{\left( {k - i} \right)/\left( {m + 1} \right)}}}} & (37)\end{matrix}$

where (m+1) represents the number of data which are subjected to themoving-averaging, and “m” is set to “4”, for example.

Then, as shown by the equation (38) described below, the model parametervector θ′(k) is subjected to a limit process (second limit process)similar to the above limit process, thus calculating a corrected modelparameter vector θL(k) expressed by the equation (39) shown below,because the model parameter a1′ and/or the model parameter a2′ maychange so that a point corresponding to the model parameters a1′ and a2′moves out of the stable region shown in FIGS. 26A and 26B due to themoving-averaging calculations. The model parameters b1′ and c1′ are notactually limited because they do not change out of the limited range bythe moving-averaging calculations.

θL(k)=LMT(θ′(k))  (38)

θL(k)^(T) =[a 1, a 2, b 1, c 1]  (39)

Details of the Model Parameter Scheduler

The reference model parameters a1base, a2base, b1base, and c1base areset by the model parameter scheduler 25. The reference model parametersa1base and a2base are set according to the target value DTHR as shown inFIG. 27. By setting the reference model parameters a1base and a2base setaccording to the target value DTHR, a higher controllability,particularly, a quicker response can be obtained, compared with the casewhere the reference model parameters a1base and a2base is set accordingto the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTH.

The reference model parameter c1base is always set to “0”, because Thereference model parameter c1base does not depend on the operatingcondition of the throttle valve actuating device (the target value DTHRor the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTH). The reference modelparameter b1base which is relevant to the control input DUT is alwaysset to the lower limit value XIDB1L of the model parameter b1irrespective of the operating condition of the throttle valve actuatingdevice.

The reference model parameter b1base is always set to the lower limitvalue XIDB1L because of the following reason.

As shown in FIG. 28B, in the case where the model parameter b1 used bythe adaptive sliding mode controller 21 prior to time tS is corrected bya b1 component db1 (see FIG. 28C) of the updating vector dθ and themodel parameter b1 is less than the reference model parameter b1base, ifthe target value DTHR changes stepwise from DTHR1 to DTHR2 at time tS asshown in FIG. 28A, it is assumed that the target value DTHR is equal tothe value DTHR2 and a value to be taken by the model parameter b1 is b1sshown in FIG. 28B.

In this example, since several steps are required for the modelparameter identifier 22 to correct the reference model parameter b1base,several steps are also required for the updating component db1 which hascorrected the reference model parameter b1base in a negative directionprior to time tS to become an appropriate value after time tS.Therefore, during the period of those several steps, the model parameterb1 takes a value which is much less than a desired value b1s. As aresult, the adaptive sliding mode controller 21 calculates a controlinput DUT which performs excessive correction, and an overshoot of thethrottle valve opening deviation amount DTH may be caused as shown inFIG. 28A.

Therefore, in the present embodiment, the reference model parameterb1base is always set to the lower limit value XDB1L to avoid thedrawbacks shown in FIGS. 28A through 28C. By setting the reference modelparameter b1base to the lower limit value XDB1L, the updated componentdb1 always takes a positive value as shown in FIG. 29C. Therefore, evenin the presence of the identification delay, for example, it isprevented that the model parameter b1 takes a value which is much lessthan the desired value b1s (see FIG. 29B), and the adaptive sliding modecontroller 21 is prevented from performing excessive correction due tothe identification delay. As a result, as shown in FIG. 29A, theovershoot of the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTH can besuppressed.

Processes Executed by the CPU of the ECU 7

Processes executed by the CPU of the ECU 7 for realizing the abovefunctions of the controller 21, the model parameter identifier 22, andthe model parameter scheduler 25 will be described below.

FIG. 30 is a flowchart showing a throttle valve opening control process,which is executed by the CPU of the ECU 7 at intervals of apredetermined period, e.g., 2 msec.

In step S11, a process of setting a state variable shown in FIG. 31 iscarried out. Specifically, calculations of the equations (2) and (3) arecarried out to determine the throttle valve opening deviation amountDTH(k) and the target value DTHR(k) in steps S31 and S32 in FIG. 31. Thesymbol (k) or (n) representing a current value may occasionally beomitted.

In step S12, it is determined whether or not the value of a counterIDCOUNT is “0”. Since the counter IDCOUNT is initially set to “0”, theprocess proceeds from step S12 to step S14, in which a process ofidentifying a model parameter is carried out, i.e., a process ofcalculating a model parameter vector θ(n) is carried out. Then, a firstlimit process shown in FIG. 34 is carried out to calculate a modelparameter vector θ*(n) in step S15. Specifically, the limit process ofthe model parameter vector 0 (n) is executed to calculate the modelparameter vector θ*(n). Elements a1*(n), a2*(n), b1*(n), and c1*(n) ofthe calculated model parameter vector θ*(n) are stored in a ring bufferfor the oversampling process. Specifically, a predetermined number N ofeach elements, i.e., elements of θ*(k), θ*(k+1), . . . , θ*(k+N−1) arestored in the ring buffer. The predetermined number N represents a ratioof the second period ΔT2 to the first period ΔT1 (ΔT2/ΔT1), and is setto “5”, for example.

In step S16, the counter IDCOUNT is set to the predetermined number N.Therefore, in the next execution of this process, the answer to step S12becomes negative (NO), and the value of the counter IDCOUNT isdecremented by “1” in step S13. Thereafter, the process proceeds to stepS17. Therefore, steps from S14 to S16 are carried out once in every Ntimes.

In step S17, a model parameter vector θ′(k) is calculated by themoving-averagimg of the limited model parameter vector θ*(n).Specifically, the model parameter stored in the ring buffer is appliedto the equations (34) through (37) to calculate model parameters a1′(k),a2′(k), b1′(k), and c1′(k).

In step S18, a second limit process shown in FIG. 39 is carried out.Specifically, the limit process of the model parameters a1′(k) anda2′(k) calculated in step S17 is carried out to calculate a correctedmodel parameter vector θL(k). The model parameters b1′(k) and c1′(k) aredirectly applied to elements b1(k) and c1(k), respectively, of thecorrected model parameter vector θL(k).

In step S19, a process of calculating a control input Usl(k) shown inFIG. 40 is carried out. Specifically, an equivalent control inputUeq(k), a reaching law input Urch(k), an adaptive law input Uadp(k), anonlinear input Unl(k), a forced vibration input Uwave, and a dampinginput Udamp(k) are calculated, and the calculated inputs are summed upto a control input Usl(k) (=duty ratio DUT(k)).

In step S20, a process of stability determination of the sliding modecontroller shown in FIG. 50 is carried out. Specifically, the stabilityof the sliding mode controller is determined based on the differentialof a Lyapunov function, and a stability determination flag FSMCSTAB isset. The stability determination flag FSMCSTAB is referred to whenperforming the calculation of the control input Usl(k).

FIG. 32 is a flowchart showing the process of identifying modelparameters in step S14 shown in FIG. 30.

In step S41, the gain coefficient vector KP(n) is calculated from theequation (19b). Then, the estimated throttle valve opening deviationamount DTHHAT(n) is calculated from the equation (17b) in step S42.

In step S43, a process of calculating ide(n) shown in FIG. 33 is carriedout to calculate the identifying error ide(n). In step S44, the updatingvector dθ(n) is calculated from the equations (14g), (33). A θ basetable shown in FIG. 27 is retrieved according to the target value DTHRto calculate the reference model parameter vector θ base in step S45. Inthe θ base table, values of the reference model parameters a1base anda2base are actually set. The reference model parameter b1base is set tothe minimum value XIDB1L of the model parameter b1. The reference modelparameter c1base is set to “0”.

In step S46, the model parameter vector θ(n) is calculated from theequation (14f). Thereafter, the process shown in FIG. 32 ends.

FIG. 33 is a flowchart showing a process of calculating an identifyingerror ide(n) in step S43 shown in FIG. 32.

In step S51, the identifying error ide(n) is calculated from theequation (16a). Then, it is determined whether or not the value of acounter CNTIDST which is incremented in step S53 is greater than apredetermined value XCNTIDST that is set according to the dead time d ofthe controlled object (step S52). XCNTIDST is set to “2”, since the deadtime d is approximated to “0” in the present embodiment. Since thecounter CNTIDST has an initial value of “0”, the process first proceedsto step S53, in which the counter CNTIDST is incremented by “1”. Next,the identifying error ide(n) is set to “0” in step S54, and the processproceeds to step S55. Immediately after the identification of the modelparameter vector θ (n) starts, no correct identifying error is obtainedby the calculation of the equation (16a). Therefore, the identifyingerror ide(n) is set to “0” by steps S52 through S54, without using thecalculated result of the equation (16a).

If the answer to the step S52 is affirmative (YES), the processimmediately proceeds to step S55.

In step S55, the identifying error ide(n) is subjected to a low-passfiltering process. Specifically, a process of correcting the frequencycharacteristics of the controlled object as described above withreference to FIGS. 6A and 6B, is carried out.

FIG. 34 is a flowchart showing the first limit process carried out instep S15 shown in FIG. 30.

In step S71, flags FA1STAB, FA2STAB, FB1LMT, and FC1LMT used in thisprocess are initialized by setting each flag to “0”. In step S72, thelimit process of the model parameters a1″ and a2″ shown in FIG. 35 isexecuted. In step S73, the limit process of the model parameter b1″shown in FIG. 37 is executed. In step S74, the limit process of themodel parameter c1″ shown in FIG. 38 is executed.

FIG. 35 is a flowchart showing the limit process of the model parametersa1″ and a2″ which is carried out in step S72 shown in FIG. 34. FIG. 36is a diagram illustrating the process shown in FIG. 35, and will bereferred to with FIG. 35.

In FIG. 36, combinations of the model parameters a1″ and a2″ which arerequired to be limited are indicated by “X” symbols, and the range ofcombinations of the model parameters a1″ and a2″ which are stable isindicated by a hatched region (hereinafter referred to as “stableregion”). The process shown in FIG. 35 is a process of moving thecombinations of the model parameters a1″ and a2″ which are in theoutside of the stable region into the stable region at positionsindicated by “◯” symbols.

In step S81, it is determined whether or not the model parameter a2″ isgreater than or equal to a predetermined a2 lower limit value XIDA2L.The predetermined a2 lower limit value XIDA2L is set to a negative valuegreater than “−1”. Stable model parameters a1* and a2* are obtained whensetting the predetermined a2 lower limit value XIDA2L to 1″. However,the predetermined a2 lower limit value XIDA2L is set to a negative valuegreater than “−1” because the matrix A defined by the equation (40) tothe “n” th power may occasionally become unstable (which means that themodel parameters a1″ and a2″ do not diverge, but oscillate).$\begin{matrix}{A = \begin{bmatrix}{a1}^{*} & {a2}^{*} \\1 & 0\end{bmatrix}} & (40)\end{matrix}$

If a2″ is less than XIDA2L in step S81, then the model parameter a2* isset to the lower limit value XIDA2L, and an a2 stabilizing flag FA2STABis set to “1” in step S82. When the a2 stabilizing flag FA2STAB is setto “1”, this indicates that the model parameter a2* is set to the lowerlimit value XIDA2L. In FIG. 36, the correction of the model parameter ina limit process P1 of steps S81 and S82 is indicated by the arrow lineswith “P1”.

If the answer to step S81 is affirmative (YES), i.e., if a2″ is greaterthan or equal to XIDA2L, then the model parameter a2* is set to themodel parameter a2″ in step S83.

In steps S84 and S85, it is determined whether or not the modelparameter a1″ is in a range defined by a predetermined a1 lower limitvalue XIDA1L and a predetermined al upper limit value XIDA1H. Thepredetermined al lower limit value XIDA1L is set to a value which isequal to or greater than “−2” and less than “0”, and the predeterminedal upper limit value XIDA1H is set to 2, for example.

If the answers to steps S84 and S85 are affirmative (YES), i.e., if a1″is greater than or equal to XIDA1L and less than or equal to XIDA1H,then the model parameter a1* is set to the model parameter a1″ in stepS88.

If a1″ is less than XIDA1L in step S84, then the model parameter a1* isset to the lower limit value XIDA1L and an a1* stabilizing flag FA1STABis set to “1” in step S86. If a1″ is greater than XIDA1H in step S85,then the model parameter a1 is set to the upper limit value XIDA1H andthe al stabilizing flag FA1STAB is set to “1” in step S87. When the alstabilizing flag FA1STAB is set to “1”, this indicates that the modelparameter a1* is set to the lower limit value XIDA1L or the upper limitvalue XIDA1H. In FIG. 36, the correction of the model parameters in alimit process P2 of steps S84 through S87 is indicated by the arrowlines with “P2”.

In step S90, it is determined whether or not the sum of the absolutevalue of the model parameter a1* and the model parameter a2* is equal toor less than a predetermined stability determining value XA2STAB. Thepredetermined stability determining value XA2STAB is set to a valueclose to “1” but less than “1” (e.g., “0.99”).

Straight lines L1 and L2 shown in FIG. 37 satisfy the following equation(41).

a 2*+|a 1*|=XA2STAB  (41)

Therefore, in step S90, it is determined whether or not the combinationof the model parameters a1* and a2* is placed at a position on or lowerthan the straight lines L1 and L2 shown in FIG. 36. If the answer tostep S90 is affirmative (YES), then the limit process immediately ends,since the combination of the model parameters a1* and a2* is in thestable region shown in FIG. 36.

If the answer to step S90 is negative (NO), then it is determinedwhether or not the model parameter a1* is less than a value obtained bysubtracting the predetermined a2 lower limit value XIDA2L from thepredetermined stability determining value XA2STAB in step S91 (sinceXIDA2L is less than “0”, (XA2STAB−XIDA2L) is greater than XA2STAB). Ifthe model parameter a1* is equal to or less than (XA2STAB−XIDA2L), thenthe model parameter a2* is set to (XA2STAB−|a1*|) and the a2 stabilizingflag FA2STAB is set to “1” in step S92.

If the model parameter a1* is greater than (XA2STAB−XIDA2L) in step S91,then the model parameter a1* is set to (XA2STAB−XIDA2L) in step S93.Further in step S93, the model parameter a2* is set to the predetermineda2 lower limit value XIDA2L, and the a1 stabilizing flag FA1STAB and thea2 stabilizing flag FA2STAB are set to “1 ”.

In FIG. 36, the correction of the model parameters in a limit process P3of steps S91 and S92 is indicated by the arrow lines with “P3”, and thecorrection of the model parameters in a limit process P4 of steps S91and S93 is indicated by the arrow lines with “P4”.

As described above, the limit process shown in FIG. 35 is carried out tobring the model parameters a1″ and a2″ into the stable region shown inFIG. 36, thus calculating the model parameters a1* and a2*.

FIG. 37 is a flowchart showing a limit process of the model parametersb1″, which is carried out in step S73 shown in FIG. 34.

In steps S101 and S102 shown in FIG. 37, it is determined whether or notthe model parameters b1″ is in a range defined by a predetermined b1lower limit value XIDB1L and a predetermined b1 upper limit valueXIDB1H. The predetermined b1 lower limit value XIDB1L is set to apredetermined positive value (e.g., “0.1”), and the predetermined b1upper limit value XIDB1H is set to “1”, for example.

If the answer to steps S101 and S102 is affirmative (YES), i.e., if b1″is greater than or equal to XIDB1L and less than or equal to XIDB1H,then the model parameter b1* is set to the model parameter b1″ in stepS105.

If b1″ is less than XIDB1L in step S101, then the model parameter b1* isset to the lower limit value XIDB1L, and a b1 limiting flag FB1LMT isset to “1” in step S104. If b1″ is greater than XIDB1H in step S102,then the model parameter b1* is set to the upper limit value XIDB1H, andthe b1 limiting flag FB1LMT is set to “1” in step S103. When the b1limiting flag FB1LMT is set to “1”, this indicates that the modelparameter b1* is set to the lower limit value XIDB1L or the upper limitvalue XIDB1H.

FIG. 38 is a flowchart showing a limit process of the model parameterc1″, which is carried out in step S74 shown in FIG. 34.

In steps S111 and S112 shown in FIG. 38, it is determined whether or notthe model parameters c1″ is in a range defined by a predetermined c1lower limit value XIDC1L and a predetermined c1 upper limit valueXIDC1H. The predetermined c1 lower limit value XIDC1L is set to “−60”,for example, and the predetermined c1 upper limit value XIDC1H is set to“60”, for example.

If the answer to steps S111 and S112 is affirmative (YES), i.e., if c1″is greater than or equal to XIDC1L and less than or equal to XIDC1H,then the model parameter c1* is set to the model parameter c1″ in stepS115.

If c1″ is less than XIDC1L in step S111, then the model parameter c1* isset to the lower limit value XIDC1L, and a c1 limiting flag FC1LMT isset to “1” in step S114. If c1″ is greater than XIDC1H in step S112,then the model parameter c1* is set to the upper limit value XIDC1H, andthe c1 limiting flag FC1LMT is set to “1” in step S113. When the c1limiting flag FC1LMT is set to “1”, this indicates that the correctedmodel parameter c1 is set to the lower limit value XIDC1L or the upperlimit value XIDC1H.

FIG. 39 is a flowchart showing the second limit process carried out instep S18 shown in FIG. 30. The second limit process is essentially thesame as the first limit process shown in FIG. 35 except that the modelparameters a1″ and a2″ in the limit process shown in FIG. 35 arereplaced respectively with the model parameters a1′ and a2′, and themodel parameters a1* and a2* in the limit process shown in FIG. 35 arereplaced respectively with the model parameters a1″ and a2″.Specifically, the moving-averaged model parameters a1′ and a2′ aresubjected to a limit process of steps S121 through S133, which issimilar to the limit process shown in FIG. 35, thereby calculatingcorrected model parameters a1 and a2.

FIG. 40 is a flowchart showing a process of calculating a control inputUsl, which is carried out in step S19 shown in FIG. 30.

In step S201, a process of calculating a switching function value σshown in FIG. 41 is carried out. In step S202, an equivalent controlinput Ueq is calculated from the equation (8b). In step S203, a processof calculating a reaching law input Urch shown in FIG. 44 is carriedout. In step S204, a process of calculating an adaptive law input Uadpshown in FIG. 45 is carried out. In step S205, a process of calculatinga nonlinear input Unl shown in FIG. 46 is carried out. In step S206, aprocess of calculating a forced vibration input Uwave shown in FIG. 47is carried out. In step S207, a process of calculating a damping inputUdamp shown in FIG. 49 is carried out.

In step S208, it is determined whether or not the stabilitydetermination flag FSMCSTAB set in a process shown in FIG. 50 is “1”.When the stability determination flag FSMCSTAB is set to “1”, thisindicates that the adaptive sliding mode controller 21 is unstable.

If FSMCSTAB is equal to “0” in step S208, indicating that the adaptivesliding mode controller 21 is stable, then the control inputs Ueq, Urch,Uadp, Unl, Uwave, and Udamp calculated in steps S202 through S207 areadded, thereby calculating the control input Usl in step S209.

If FSMCSTAB is equal to “1” in step S208, indicating that the adaptivesliding mode controller 21 is unstable, then the sum of the reaching lawinput Urch and the adaptive law input Uadp is calculated as the controlinput Usl. In other words, the equivalent control input Ueq, thenonlinear input Unl, the forced vibration input Uwave, and the dampinginput Udamp are not used for calculating the control input Usl, whichprevents the control system from becoming unstable.

In steps S211 and S212, it is determined whether or not the calculatedcontrol input Usl is in a range defined by a predetermined upper limitvalue XUSLH and a predetermined lower limit value XUSLL. If the controlinput Usl is in this range, then the process shown in FIG. 40immediately ends. If the control input Usl is equal to or less than thepredetermined lower limit value XUSLL in step S211, then the controlinput Usl is set to the predetermined lower limit value XUSLL in stepS214. If the control input Usl is equal to or greater than thepredetermined upper limit value XUSLH in step S212, then the controlinput Usl is set to the predetermined upper limit value XUSLH in stepS213.

FIG. 41 is a flowchart showing a process of calculating the switchingfunction value σ which is carried out in step S201 shown in FIG. 40.

In step S221, a VPOLE calculation process shown in FIG. 42 is carriedout to calculate the switching function setting parameter VPOLE. Then,the switching function value σ(k) is calculated from the equation (5b)in step S222.

In steps S223 and 224, it is determined whether or not the calculatedswitching function value σ(k) is in a range defined by a predeterminedupper limit value XSGMH and a predetermined lower limit value XSGML. Ifthe calculated switching function value σ(k) is in this range, then theprocess shown in FIG. 41 immediately ends. If the calculated switchingfunction value σ(k) is equal to or less than the predetermined lowerlimit value XSGML in step S223, then the calculated switching functionvalue σ(k) is set to the predetermined lower limit value XSGML in stepS225. If the calculated switching function value σ(k) is equal to orgreater than the predetermined upper limit value XSGMH in step S224,then the calculated switching function value σ(k) is set to thepredetermined upper limit value XSGMH in step S226.

FIG. 42 is a flowchart showing the VPOLE calculation process which iscarried out in step S221 shown in FIG. 41.

In step S231 shown in FIG. 42, it is determined whether or not thestability determination flag FSMCSTAB is “1”. If FSMCSTAB is equal to“1” in step S231, indicating that the adaptive sliding mode controller21 is unstable, then the switching function setting parameter VPOLE isset to a predetermined stabilizing value XPOLESTB in step S232. Thepredetermined stabilizing value XPOLESTB is set to a value greater than“−1” but very close to “−1” (e.g., “−0.999”).

If FSMCSTAB is equal to “0”, indicating that the adaptive sliding modecontroller 21 is stable, then a VPOLE table shown in FIG. 43 isretrieved according to the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTHto calculate a switching function setting parameter VPOLE in step S234.The VPOLE table is set so that the switching function setting parameterVPOLE increases when the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTHtakes a value in vicinity of “0”, i.e., when the throttle valve openingTH takes a value in vicinity of the default opening THDEF, and theswitching function setting parameter VPOLE is substantially constantregardless of changes in the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTHwhen the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTH takes a value whichis not in the vicinity of “0”. Therefore, when the throttle valveopening TH is in vicinity of the default opening THDEF, the switchingfunction setting parameter VPOLE is set to a relatively large value,which improves the controllability in the vicinity of the defaultopening THDEF.

In steps S235 and S236, it is determined whether or not the calculatedswitching function setting parameter VPOLE is in a range defined by apredetermined upper limit value XPOLEH and a predetermined lower limitvalue XPOLEL. If the switching function setting parameter VPOLE is inthis range, then the process shown in FIG. 42 immediately ends. If theswitching function setting parameter VPOLE is equal to or less than thepredetermined lower limit value XPOLEL in step S236, then the switchingfunction setting parameter VPOLE is set to the predetermined lower limitvalue XPOLEL in step S238. If the switching function setting parameterVPOLE is equal to or greater than the predetermined upper limit value.XPOLEH in step S235, then the switching function setting parameter VPOLEis set to the predetermined upper limit value XPOLEH in step S237.

FIG. 44 is a flowchart showing a process of calculating the reaching lawinput Urch, which is carried out in step S203 shown in FIG. 40.

In step S251, it is determined whether or not the switching functionvalue σ is equal to or less than a predetermined lower limit value−XSGMSL. If a is less than or equal to −XSGMSL, then a switchingfunction parameter SGMS is set to the predetermined lower limit value−XSGMSL in step S252. If σ is greater than −XSGMSL, it is determinedwhether or not the switching function value σ is equal or greater than apredetermined upper limit value XSGMSL in step S253. If a is greaterthan or equal to XSGMSL, then the switching function parameter SGMS isset to the predetermined upper limit value XSGMSL in step S254. If theswitching function value a falls between the predetermined lower limitvalue −XSGMSL and the predetermined upper limit value XSGMSL, then theswitching function parameter SGMS is set to the switching function valueσ in step S255.

The switching function value σ used in calculating the reaching lawinput Urch is limited in steps S251 through S255. The switching functionparameter SGMS is a parameter corresponding to the limited switchingfunction value σ. The limit process makes it possible to prevent thethrottle valve opening deviation amount DTH from overshooting withrespect to the target value DTHR when the target value DTHR changesabruptly.

In step S261, it is determined whether or not the stabilitydetermination flag FSMCSTAB is “1”. If the stability determination flagFSMCSTAB is “0”, indicating that the adaptive sliding mode controller 21is stable, then the control gain F is set according to the switchingfunction value σ as shown in FIG. 13A (Step S 262).

The reaching law input Urch is calculated according to the followingequation (42) in step S263. The equation (42) is similar to the equation(9) except that the switching function value σ in the equation (9) isreplaced with the switching function parameter SGMS.

Urch=−F×SGMS/b 1  (42)

If the stability determination flag FSMCSTAB is “1”, indicating that theadaptive sliding mode controller 21 is unstable, then the control gain Fis set to a predetermined stabilizing gain XKRCHSTB in step S264, andthe reaching law input Urch is calculated according to the followingequation (43), which does not include the model parameter b1, in stepS265.

Urch=−F×SGMS  (43)

In steps S266 and S267, it is determined whether or not the calculatedreaching law input Urch is in a range defined by a predetermined upperlimit value XURCHH and a predetermined lower limit value XURCHL. If thereaching law input Urch is in this range, then the process shown in FIG.44 is immediately put to an end. If the reaching law input Urch is equalto or less than the predetermined lower limit value XURCHL in step S266,then the reaching law input Urch is set to the predetermined lower limitvalue XURCHL in step S268. If the reaching law input Urch is equal to orgreater than the predetermined upper limit value XURCHH in step S267,then the reaching law input Urch is set to the predetermined upper limitvalue XURCHH in step S269.

As described above, when the adaptive sliding mode controller 21 becomesunstable, the control gain F is set to the predetermined stabilizinggain XKRCHSTB, and the reaching law input Urch is calculated withoutusing the model parameter b1, which brings the adaptive sliding modecontroller 21 back to its stable state. When the identifying processcarried out by the model parameter identifier 22 becomes unstable, theadaptive sliding mode controller 21 becomes unstable. Therefore, byusing the equation (43) that does not include the model parameter b1which has become unstable, the adaptive sliding mode controller 21 canbe stabilized.

FIG. 45 is a flowchart showing a process of calculating an adaptive lawinput Uadp, which is carried out in step S204 shown in FIG. 40.

In step S271, it is determined whether or not the switching functionvalue σ is equal to or less than a predetermined lower limit value−XSGMSL. If σ is less than or equal to −XSGMSL, then a switchingfunction parameter SGMS is set to the predetermined lower limit value−XSGMSL in step S272. If σ is greater than −XSGMSL, it is determinedwhether or not the switching function value σ is equal or greater than apredetermined upper limit value XSGMSL in step S273. If σ is greaterthan or equal to XSGMSL, then the switching function parameter SGMS isset to the predetermined upper limit value XSGMSL in step S274. If theswitching function value a falls between the predetermined lower limitvalue −XSGMSL and the predetermined upper limit value XSGMSL, then theswitching function parameter SGMS is set to the switching function valueσ in step S275.

The switching function value σ used in calculating the adaptive lawinput Uadp is limited in steps S271 through S275. The switching functionparameter SGMS is a parameter corresponding to the limited switchingfunction value σ. The limit process makes it possible to prevent thethrottle valve opening deviation amount DTH from overshooting withrespect to the target value DTHR when the target value DTHR changesabruptly.

In step S276, it is determined whether or not the stabilitydetermination flag FSMCSTAB is “1”. If FSMCSTAB is equal to “0”,indicating that the adaptive sliding mode controller 21 is stable, thenthe control gain G is set according to the switching function value σ asshown in FIG. 13A in step S279.

Then, the switching function parameter SGMS and the control gain G areapplied to the equation (44) shown below to calculate an adaptive lawinput Uadp(k) in step S280. The equation (44) is similar to the equation(10c) except that the switching function value σ in the equation (10c)is replaced with the switching function parameter SGMS.

Uadp(k)=Uadp(k−1)−G×SGMS×ΔT 1/b 1  (44)

If FSMCSTAB is equal to “1” in step S276, indicating that the adaptivesliding mode controller 21 is unstable, then the control gain G is setto a predetermining stabilized gain SKADPSTB in step S277, and anadaptive law input Uadp(k) is calculated from the equation (45) in stepS278. The equation (45) is an equation obtained by removing the modelparameter b1 from the equation (44).

Uadp(k)=Uadp(k−1)−G×SGMS×ΔT 1  (45)

In steps S281 and 282, it is determined whether or not the calculatedadaptive law input Uadp is in a range defined by a predetermined upperlimit value XUADPH and a predetermined lower limit value XUADPL. If theadaptive law input Uadp is in this range, then the process shown in FIG.45 immediately ends. If the adaptive law input Uadp is equal to or lessthan the predetermined lower limit value XUADPL in step S282, then theadaptive law input Uadp is set to the predetermined lower limit valueXUADPL in step S284. If the adaptive law input Uadp is equal to orgreater than the predetermined upper limit value XUADPH in step S281,then the adaptive law input Uadp is set to the predetermined upper limitvalue XUADPH in step S283.

FIG. 46 is a flowchart showing a process of calculating a nonlinearinput Unl, which is carried out in step S205 shown in FIG. 40.

In step S301, a nonlinear input gain Knl is calculated according to thethrottle valve opening deviation amount DTH (see FIG. 20). In step S302,it is determined whether or not the switching function value σ is equalto or less than a predetermined lower limit value −XNLTH. If σ isgreater than −XNLTH, then it is determined whether the switchingfunction value σ is equal to or greater than a predetermined upper limitvalue XNLTH in step S304. If the switching function value σ fallsbetween the predetermined upper limit value XNLTH and the predeterminedlower limit value −XNLTH, then the switching function value σ is set toa nonlinear input parameter SNL (step S306).

If the switching function value σ is equal to or less than thepredetermined lower limit value −XNLTH, then the nonlinear inputparameter SNL is set to “−1” in step S303. If the switching functionvalue σ is equal to or greater than the predetermined upper limit valueXNLTH, then the nonlinear input parameter SNL is set to “1” in stepS305.

In step S307, a nonlinear input Unl(k) is calculated according to thefollowing equation (46).

Unl(k)=−Knl×SNL/b 1  (46)

In the process shown in FIG. 46, the nonlinear input parameter SNL isused in place of the sign function sgn(σ(k)) in the equation (22), andthe switching function value σ is directly applied in a predeterminedrange where the absolute value of the switching function value σ issmall. This makes it possible to suppress the chattering due to thenonlinear input Unl.

FIG. 47 is a flowchart showing a process of calculating a forcedvibration input Uwave which is carried out in step S206 shown in FIG.40.

In step S311, a time parameter twave(k) is calculated from the followingequation (47).

twave(k)=twave(k−1)+XTWAVEINC  (47)

where XTWAVEINC represents an elapsed time period which is set to theexecution period of this process.

In step S312, it is determined whether or not the time parametertwave(k) is equal to or greater than a predetermined period TPERIOD(e.g., 1 second). If twave(k) is less than TPERIOD, then the processproceeds to step S314. If twave(k) is greater than or equal to TPERIOD,then the time parameter twave(k) is reset to “0” in step S313.Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S314.

In step S314, an Fwave table shown in FIG. 48 is retrieved according tothe time parameter twave(k) to calculate a dither signal value Fwave.The waveform shown in FIG. 48 is slightly different from the waveformshown in FIG. 21. The Fwave table may be set according to the waveformshown in FIG. 21.

In step S315, the dither input basic gain Kwave and the identifyingerror ide(k) are applied to the following equation (48) to calculate adither input gain KWID (see the equation (23)).

KWID=Kwave×|ide(k)|  (48)

In step S316, it is determined whether or not the dither input gain KWIDis less than a predetermined upper limit value XKWIDL. If KWID is lessthan XKWIDL, the process proceeds to step S320. If the dither input gainKWID is equal to or greater than the predetermined upper limit valueXKWIDL, then the dither input gain KWID is set to the predeterminedupper limit value XKWIDL in step S318.

In step S320, a forced vibration input Uwave(k) is calculated accordingto the following equation (49), which is substantially the same as theequation (23).

Uwave(k)=KWID×Fwave/b 1  (49)

FIG. 49 is a flowchart showing a process of calculating a damping inputUdamp which is carried out in step S207 shown in FIG. 40.

In step S331, a moving average value DTHRAV of an amount of change inthe target value DTHR is calculated according to the above-describedequation (29). In step S332, a basic value Kdampbs of a damping controlgain is calculated according to the throttle valve opening deviationamount DTH (see FIG. 25A). In step S333, a correction coefficient Kkdampof a damping control gain is calculated according to the moving averagevalue DDTHRAV in step S333 (see FIG. 25B).

In step S334, a damping control gain Kdamp is calculated by multiplyingthe basic value Kdampbs by the correction coefficient Kkdamp. Then, adamping input Udamp(k) is calculated according to the following equation(27) (shown again).

Udamp(k)=−Kdamp×(DTH(k)−DTH(k−1))/b 1  (27)

FIG. 50 is a flowchart showing a process of stability determination ofthe sliding mode controller, which is carried out in step S20 shown inFIG. 30. In this process, the stability is determined based on thedifferential of a Lyapunov function, and the stability determinationflag FSMCSTAB is set according to the result of the stabilitydetermination.

In step S351, a switching function change amount D a is calculated fromthe following equation (50). A stability determining parameter SGMSTABis calculated from the following equation (51) in step S352.

 Dσ=σ(k)−σ(k−k0)  (50)

SGMSTAB=Dσ×σ(k)  (51)

In step S353, it is determined whether or not the stability determiningparameter SGMSTAB is equal to or less than a stability determiningthreshold XSGMSTAB. If SGMSTAB is greater than XSGMSTAB, then it isdetermined that the adaptive sliding mode controller 21 may possibly beunstable, and an unstability detecting counter CNTSMCST is incrementedby “1” in step S355. If SGMSTAB is less than or equal to XSGMSTAB, thenthe adaptive sliding mode controller 21 is determined to be stable, andthe count of the unstability detecting counter CNTSMCST is notincremented but maintained in step S354.

In step S356, it is determined whether or not the value of theunstability detecting counter CNTSMCST is equal to or less than apredetermined count XSSTAB. If CNTSMCST is less than or equal to XSSTAB,then the adaptive sliding mode controller 21 is determined to be stable,and a first determination flag FSMCSTAB1 is set to “0” in step S357. IfCNTSMCST is greater than XSSTAB, then the adaptive sliding modecontroller 21 is determined to be unstable, and the first determinationflag FSMCSTAB1 is set to “1” in step S358. The value of the unstabilitydetecting counter CNTSMCST is initialized to “0” when the ignitionswitch is turned on.

In step S359, a stability determining period counter CNTJUDST isdecremented by “1”. It is then determined whether or not the value ofthe stability determining period counter CNTJUDST is “0” in step S360.The value of the stability determining period counter CNTJUDST isinitialized to a predetermined determining count XCJUDST when theignition switch is turned on. Initially, therefore, the answer to stepS360 is negative (NO), and the process immediately goes to step S365.

If the value of the stability determining period counter CNTJUDSTsubsequently becomes “0”, then the process goes from step S360 to stepS361, in which it is determined whether or not the first determinationflag FSMCSTAB1 is “1”. If the first determination flag FSMCSTAB1 is “0”,then a second determination flag FSMCSTAB2 is set to “0” in step S363.If the first determination flag FSMCSTAB1 is “1”, then the seconddetermination flag FSMCSTAB2 is set to “1” in step S362.

In step S364, the value of the stability determining period counterCNTJUDST is set to the predetermined determining count XCJUDST, and theunstability detecting counter CNTSMCST is set to “0”. Thereafter, theprocess goes to step S365.

In step S365, the stability determination flag FSMCSTAB is set to thelogical sum of the first determination flag FSMCSTAB1 and the seconddetermination flag FSMCSTAB2. The second determination flag FSMCSTAB2 ismaintained at “1” until the value of the stability determining periodcounter CNTJUDST becomes “0”, even if the answer to step S356 becomesaffirmative (YES) and the first determination flag FSMCSTAB1 is set to“0”. Therefore, the stability determination flag FSMCSTAB is alsomaintained at “1” until the value of the stability determining periodcounter CNTJUDST becomes “0”.

In the present embodiment, the throttle valve actuating device 10 and aportion of the ECU 7, i.e., the output circuit for supplying anenergizing current to the motor 6, correspond to a plant, and the ECU 7constitutes an adaptive sliding mode controller as the responsespecifying type controller, a switching function value calculatingmeans, a reaching mode input calculating means, a correcting means, alimit means and an identifying means. More specifically, step S19 shownin FIG. 30, i.e., the process shown in FIG. 40, corresponds to theresponse specifying type controller. The process shown in FIG. 41corresponds to the switching function value calculating means. Theprocesses shown in FIGS. 44 and 45 correspond to the reaching mode inputcalculating means. Steps S251 through S255 in FIG. 44, and steps S271through S274 in FIG. 45 correspond to the limit means. Step S262 in FIG.44 and step S279 in FIG. 45 correspond to the correcting means. StepsS12 through S18 shown in FIG. 30 correspond to the identifying means.

Second Embodiment

FIG. 51 is a diagram showing the configuration of a hydraulicpositioning device and its control system, which is a control system fora plant according to a second embodiment of the present invention. Sucha hydraulic positioning device can be used for a continuously variablevalve timing mechanism for continuously varying the valve timing of theintake and exhaust valves. The continuously variable valve timingmechanism changes rotational phases of the cams for driving the intakeand exhaust valves to shift the opening/closing timing of the intake andexhaust valves, which improves the charging efficiency of the engine andreduces the pumping loss of the engine.

The hydraulic positioning device includes a piston 64, a hydrauliccylinder 61 in which the piston 64 is fitted, an electrically-drivenspool valve 67, a hydraulic pump 65, an oil pressure supply line 66 forsupplying an oil pressure from the hydraulic pump 65 to theelectrically-driven spool valve 67, a first oil passage 68 for supplyinga first oil pressure P1 to a first oil pressure chamber 62 of thehydraulic cylinder 61, a second oil passage 69 for supplying a secondoil pressure P2 to a second oil pressure chamber 63 of the hydrauliccylinder 61, and an oil pressure release line 70 for returning hydraulicoil discharged from the electrically-driven spool valve 67 to an oil pan(not shown).

A potentiometer 71 is provided for detecting a position PACT of thepiston 64, and a signal indicating the detected position PACT issupplied to an electronic control unit (ECU) 72.

A target position PCMD is input to the ECU 72. The ECU 72 calculates acontrol quantity DUT so that the detected position PACT coincides withthe target position PCMD, and supplies an electrical signal according tothe control quantity DUT to the electrically-driven spool valve 67.

The electrically-driven spool valve 67 moves the position of a valveelement (not shown) according to the control quantity DUT, and outputsthe first and second oil pressure P1 and P2 according to the position ofthe valve element. When the pressure difference DP (=P1−P2) between thefirst and second oil pressures P1 and P2 is a positive value, the piston64 moves to the right as viewed in FIG. 51. When the pressure differenceDP is a negative value, the piston 64 moves to the left as viewed inFIG. 51. In the condition where the detected position PACT coincideswith the target position PCMD, the pressure difference DP is maintainedat “0”

FIG. 52 is a block diagram showing a control system for controlling thehydraulic positioning device shown in FIG. 51 with an adaptive slidingmode controller.

The control system 80 includes an identifier 81, an adaptive slidingmode controller 82, a scheduler 83, and subtractors 85, 86. The controlsystem 80 is realized by processes which are carried out by a CPUincluded in the ECU 72.

The subtractor 85 subtracts a reference value PBASE from the detectedposition PACT to calculate a detected position deviation amount DPACT.The subtractor 86 subtracts the reference value PBASE from the targetposition PCMD to calculate a target value DPCMD. The reference valuePBASE is preset to an optimum value based on the operatingcharacteristics of the hydraulic positioning device.

The detected position PACT and the detected position deviation amountDPACT in the present embodiment correspond respectively to the throttleopening TH and the throttle valve opening deviation amount DTH in thefirst embodiment. The target position PCMD and the target value DPCMD inthe present embodiment correspond respectively to the target opening THRand the target value DTHR in the first embodiment.

The scheduler 83, similarly to the model parameter scheduler 25 in thefirst embodiment, calculates a reference model parameter vector θ baseaccording to the target value DPCMD, and supplies the reference modelparameter vector θ base to the identifier 81.

The identifier 81, similarly to the model parameter identifier 22 in thefirst embodiment, calculates a corrected model parameter vector θ L(k)according to the control quantity DUT as a control input and thedetected position deviation amount DPACT as a control output.Specifically, the identifier 81 calculates an identifying error ide(n)from the equations (52) and (53) shown below. An input/output parametervector ζ(n) is defined from the equation (54) shown below.

ide(n)=DPACT(n)(k)−DPACTHAT(n)  (52)

DPACTHAT(n)=θ*(n−1)^(T)ζ(n)  (53)

ζ^(T)(n)=[DPACT(n−1), DPACT(n−2), DUT(n−1), 1]  (54)

The identifying error ide(n) is applied to the equation (30), and theequations (14f), (14g), (19b), and (33) are used to calculate a modelparameter vector θ(n). The calculated model parameter vector θ(n) issubjected to a first limit process, which is similar to the first limitprocess in the first embodiment, to calculate a model parameter vectorθ*(n). The model parameter vector θ*(n) is oversampled andmoving-averaged to calculate a model parameter vector θ′(k). The modelparameter vector θ′(k) is subjected to a second limit process, which issimilar to the second limit process in the first embodiment, tocalculate a corrected model parameter vector θL(k).

The adaptive sliding mode controller 82, similarly to the adaptivesliding mode controller 21 in the first embodiment, applies the detectedposition deviation amount DPACT to the equation (55) shown below tocalculate an equivalent control input Ueq(k). The adaptive sliding modecontroller 82 calculates a switching function value ((k) from theequation (56) shown below, and applies the switching function value ((k)to the equations (9) and (10c) described above to calculate a reachinglaw input Urch(k) and an adaptive law input Uadp(k). A switchingfunction setting parameter VPOLE and control gains F and G are set tovalues suitable for the controlled object in the present embodiment,i.e., the hydraulic positioning device.

Ueq(k)=(1/b 1){(1−a 1−VPOLE)DPACT(k)+(VPOLE−a 2)DPACT(k−k 0)−c 1}  (55)

σ(k)=(DPACT(k)−DPCMD(k))+VPOLE(DPACT(k−k 0)−DPCMD(k−k 0))  (56)

The adaptive sliding mode controller 82 applies the switching functionvalue σ(k) calculated from the equation (56) to the above equation (22)to calculate a nonlinear input Unl(k). A nonlinear input gain Knl is seta value suitable for the controlled object in the present embodiment.

The adaptive sliding mode controller 82 applies the identifying erroride(n) calculated from the equation (52) to the above-described equation(23) to calculate a forced vibration input Uwave. A dither input basicgain Kwave and a dither signal value Fwave are set to values suitablefor the controlled object in the present embodiment.

The adaptive sliding mode controller 82 calculates a damping inputUdamp(k) from the equation (57) shown below. A damping control gainKdamp is set to a value suitable for the controlled object in thepresent embodiment.

Udamp(k)=−Kdamp×(DACT(k)−DACT(k−1))/b 1  (57)

The adaptive sliding mode controller 82 adds the equivalent controlinput Ueq(k), the reaching law input Urch(k), the adaptive law inputUadp(k), the nonlinear input Unl(k), the forced vibration inputUwave(k), and the damping input Udamp(k) to thereby calculate a controlinput Usl (=DUT).

Since the control system 80 performs a control process in which thecontrol output TH and the target opening THR in the first embodiment arereplaced respectively by the control output PACT and the target positionPCMD, the control output PACT is controlled to follow up the targetposition PCMD with good robustness as similar to the first embodiment.

According to the present embodiment, the hydraulic positioning deviceshown in FIG. 52 corresponds to a plant, and the ECU 72 constitutes aresponse specifying type controller, a switching function valuecalculating means, a reaching mode input calculating means, a correctingmeans, a limit means, and an identifying means in the claimed invention.

The present invention is not limited to the above embodiments, butvarious modifications may be made. For example, while the hydraulicpositioning device is shown in the second embodiment, the controlprocess carried out by the control system 80 in the second embodimentmay be applied to a pneumatic positioning device which uses pneumaticpressure instead of hydraulic pressure.

The response-specifying controller that performs a feedback control tomake an output of a controlled object coincide with a target value andspecifies the damping characteristic of a control deviation of thefeedback control process, is not limited to an adaptive sliding modecontroller. A controller for performing a back stepping control whichrealizes control results similar to those of the sliding mode control,may be used as a response-specifying controller.

In the above embodiments, the period of the calculation for identifyingmodel parameters is set to a period which is equal to the second periodΔT2. However, the period of the calculation for identifying modelparameters may not necessarily be set to the same period as the secondperiod ΔT2, but may be set to a period between the first period ΔT1 andthe second period ΔT2, or a period which is longer than the secondperiod ΔT2.

In the above embodiments, the parameter k0 indicative of the samplingtime interval for the deviation e(k) involved in the calculation of theswitching function value a is set to ΔT2/ΔT1 which is a discrete timecorresponding to the second period ΔT2. Alternatively, the parameter k0may be set to another integer which is greater than “1”.

The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms withoutdeparting from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. Thepresently disclosed embodiments are therefore to be considered in allrespects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the inventionbeing indicated by the appended claims, rather than the foregoingdescription, and all changes which come within the meaning and range ofequivalency of the claims are, therefore, to be embraced therein.

What is claimed is:
 1. A control system for a plant, including aresponse specifying type controller for controlling said plant with aresponse specifying type control so that an output of said plantcoincides with a control target value, said response specifying typecontroller includes: switching function value calculating means forcalculating a value of a switching function which is defined as a linearfunction of a deviation between the output of said plant and the controltarget value, reaching mode input calculating means for calculating areaching mode input that contributes to placing a deviation statequantity which is defined based on the deviation, onto a switchingstraight line on which the value of the switching function becomes zero,and correcting means for correcting the reaching mode input according tothe value of the switching function, wherein a control input from saidresponse specifying type controller to said plant includes the reachingmode input.
 2. A control system according to claim 1, wherein saidreaching mode input calculating means calculates a reaching law input byaccumulating a value which is obtained by multiplying an amount ofchange in the value of the switching function with a first gain, andsaid correcting means changes the first gain according to the value ofthe switching function.
 3. A control system according to claim 1,wherein said reaching mode input calculating means calculates anadaptive law input by accumulating a value which is obtained bymultiplying the value of the switching function with a second gain, andsaid correcting means changes the second gain according to the value ofthe switching function.
 4. A control system according to claim 1,wherein said reaching mode input calculating means includes limit meansfor limiting the value of the switching function within a predeterminedrange, and calculates the reaching mode input using the switchingfunction value limited by said limit means.
 5. A control systemaccording to claim 2, wherein said correcting means reduces an absolutevalue of the first gain as an absolute value of the switching functionincreases.
 6. A control system according to claim 3, wherein saidcorrecting means reduces an absolute value of the second gain as anabsolute value of the switching function increases.
 7. A control systemaccording to claim 1, further including identifying means foridentifying a model parameter vector of a controlled object model whichis obtained by modeling said plant, wherein said reaching mode inputcalculating means calculates the reaching mode input using an element ofthe model parameter vector.
 8. A control system according to claim 1,wherein said plant includes a throttle valve actuating device having athrottle valve of an internal combustion engine and actuating means foractuating said throttle valve, and said response specifying typecontroller calculates a parameter for determining a control input to beapplied to said throttle valve actuating device to make an opening ofsaid throttle valve coincide with a target opening.
 9. A control systemfor a plant, including a response specifying type controller forcontrolling said plant with a response specifying type control so thatan output of said plant coincides with a control target value, saidresponse specifying type controller includes: switching function valuecalculating means for calculating a value of a switching function whichis defined as a linear function of a deviation between the output ofsaid plant and the control target value, reaching mode input calculatingmeans for calculating a reaching mode input for calculating a reachingmode input that contributes to placing a deviation state quantity whichis defined based on the deviation, onto a switching straight line onwhich the value of the switching function becomes zero, and correctingmeans for correcting the reaching mode input according to the deviation,wherein a control input from said response specifying type controller tosaid plant includes the reaching mode input.
 10. A control systemaccording to claim 9, wherein said correcting means reduces an absolutevalue of the reaching mode input as an absolute value of the deviationincreases.
 11. A control system for a plant, including a responsespecifying type controller for controlling said plant with a responsespecifying type control so that an output of said plant coincides with acontrol target value, said response specifying type controller includes:switching function value calculating means for calculating a value of aswitching function which is defined as a linear function of a deviationbetween the output of said plant and the control target value, reachingmode input calculating means for calculating a reaching mode input forcalculating a reaching mode input that contributes to placing adeviation state quantity which is defined based on the deviation, onto aswitching straight line on which the value of the switching functionbecomes zero, and correcting means for correcting the reaching modeinput according to the output of said plant, wherein a control inputfrom said response specifying type controller to said plant includes thereaching mode input.
 12. A control method for a plant, comprising thesteps of: a) calculating a value of a switching function which isdefined as a linear function of a deviation between an output of saidplant and a control target value; b) calculating a reaching mode inputfor calculating a reaching mode input that contributes to placing adeviation state quantity which is defined based on the deviation, onto aswitching straight line on which the value of the switching functionbecomes zero; c) correcting the reaching mode input according to thevalue of the switching function; d) calculating a control input to saidplant with a response specifying type control, said control inputincluding the corrected reaching mode input; and e) controlling saidplant with the calculated control input so that the output of said plantcoincides with the control target value.
 13. A control method accordingto claim 12, wherein a reaching law input is calculated by accumulatinga value which is obtained by multiplying an amount of change in thevalue of the switching function with a first gain, and the first gain ischanged according to the value of the switching function.
 14. A controlmethod according to claim 12, wherein an adaptive law input iscalculated by accumulating a value which is obtained by multiplying thevalue of the switching function with a second gain, and the second gainis changed according to the value of the switching function.
 15. Acontrol method according to claim 12, further including the steps oflimiting the value of the switching function within a predeterminedrange, and calculating the reaching mode input using the limitedswitching function value.
 16. A control method according to claim 13,wherein an absolute value of the first gain is reduced as an absolutevalue of the switching function increases.
 17. A control methodaccording to claim 14, wherein an absolute value of the second gain isreduced as an absolute value of the switching function increases.
 18. Acontrol method according to claim 12, further including the step ofidentifying a model parameter vector of a controlled object model whichis obtained by modeling said plant, wherein the reaching mode input iscalculated using an element of the model parameter vector.
 19. A controlmethod according to claim 12, wherein said plant includes a throttlevalve actuating device having a throttle valve of an internal combustionengine and an actuator for actuating said throttle valve, and aparameter for determining a control input to be applied to said throttlevalve actuating device is calculated to make an opening of said throttlevalve coincide with a target opening.
 20. A control method for a plant,comprising the steps of: a) calculating a value of a switching functionwhich is defined as a linear function of a deviation between an outputof said plant and a control target value; b) calculating a reaching modeinput for calculating a reaching mode input that contributes to placinga deviation state quantity which is defined based on the deviation, ontoa switching straight line on which the value of the switching functionbecomes zero; c) correcting the reaching mode input according to thedeviation; d) calculating a control input to said plant with a responsespecifying type control, said control input including the correctedreaching mode input; and e) controlling said plant with the calculatedcontrol input so that the output of said plant coincides with thecontrol target value.
 21. A control method according to claim 20,wherein an absolute value of the reaching mode input is reduced as anabsolute value of the deviation increases.
 22. A control method for aplant, comprising the steps of: a) calculating a value of a switchingfunction which is defined as a linear function of a deviation between anoutput of said plant and a control target value; b) calculating areaching mode input for calculating a reaching mode input thatcontributes to placing a deviation state quantity which is defined basedon the deviation, onto a switching straight line on which the value ofthe switching function becomes zero; c) correcting the reaching modeinput according to the output of said plant; d) calculating a controlinput to said plant with a response specifying type control, saidcontrol input including the corrected reaching mode input; and e)controlling said plant with the calculated control input so that theoutput of said plant coincides with the control target value.
 23. Acomputer program for causing a computer to carry out a control methodfor a plant, said control method comprising the steps of: a) calculatinga value of a switching function which is defined as a linear function ofa deviation between an output of said plant and a control target value;b) calculating a reaching mode input for calculating a reaching modeinput that contributes to placing a deviation state quantity which isdefined based on the deviation, onto a switching straight line on whichthe value of the switching function becomes zero; c) correcting thereaching mode input according to the value of the switching function; d)calculating a control input to said plant with a response specifyingtype control, said control input including the corrected reaching modeinput; and e) controlling said plant with the calculated control inputso that the output of said plant coincides with the control targetvalue.
 24. A computer program according to claim 23, wherein a reachinglaw input is calculated by accumulating a value which is obtained bymultiplying an amount of change in the value of the switching functionwith a first gain, and the first gain is changed according to the valueof the switching function.
 25. A computer program according to claim 23,wherein an adaptive law input is calculated by accumulating a valuewhich is obtained by multiplying the value of the switching functionwith a second gain, and the second gain is changed according to thevalue of the switching function.
 26. A computer program according toclaim 23, wherein said control method further includes the steps oflimiting the value of the switching function within a predeterminedrange, and calculating the reaching mode input using the limitedswitching function value.
 27. A computer program according to claim 24,wherein an absolute value of the first gain is reduced as an absolutevalue of the switching function increases.
 28. A computer programaccording to claim 25, wherein an absolute value of the second gain isreduced as an absolute value of the switching function increases.
 29. Acomputer program according to claim 23, wherein said control methodfurther includes the step of identifying a model parameter vector of acontrolled object model which is obtained by modeling said plant, andthe reaching mode input is calculated using an element of the modelparameter vector.
 30. A computer program according to claim 23, whereinsaid plant includes a throttle valve actuating device having a throttlevalve of an internal combustion engine and an actuator for actuatingsaid throttle valve, and a parameter for determining a control input tobe applied to said throttle valve actuating device is calculated to makean opening of said throttle valve coincide with a target opening.
 31. Acomputer program for causing a computer to carry out a control methodfor a plant, said control method comprising the steps of: a) calculatinga value of a switching function which is defined as a linear function ofa deviation between an output of said plant and a control target value;b) calculating a reaching mode input for calculating a reaching modeinput that contributes to placing a deviation state quantity which isdefined based on the deviation, onto a switching straight line on whichthe value of the switching function becomes zero; c) correcting thereaching mode input according to the deviation; d) calculating a controlinput to said plant with a response specifying type control, saidcontrol input including the corrected reaching mode input; and e)controlling said plant with the calculated control input so that theoutput of said plant coincides with the control target value.
 32. Acomputer program according to claim 31, wherein an absolute value of thereaching mode input is reduced as an absolute value of the deviationincreases.
 33. A computer program for causing a computer to carry out acontrol method for a plant, said control method comprising the steps of:a) calculating a value of a switching function which is defined as alinear function of a deviation between an output of said plant and acontrol target value; b) calculating a reaching mode input forcalculating a reaching mode input that contributes to placing adeviation state quantity which is defined based on the deviation, onto aswitching straight line on which the value of the switching functionbecomes zero; c) correcting the reaching mode input according to theoutput of said plant; d) calculating a control input to said plant witha response specifying type control, said control input including thecorrected reaching mode input; and e) controlling said plant with thecalculated control input so that the output of said plant coincides withthe control target value.